|
|
Enron Mail |
I'm just going to say that a permit app has not been submitted, then.
Mitch From: Gus Eghneim on 10/24/2000 01:37 PM To: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron cc: Subject: Re: FW: Questions/Wheatland Mitch - Whether or not we qualify to even apply for an NPDES permit is contingent upon the results of the mercury sampling. If the Mercury concentration is greater than 12 ppt, we can not apply for a permit. This is a very low threshold and it is likely that we are not going to meet it. The sampling was done last week, but the results are not out yet. If the results show that we can meet the mercury limit, we still need to assess the cost of building a 3-mile pipeline to the white river. We have not yet given authorization to do this study. Ross Newlin is taking the lead on this. If everything goes well, we may be able to submit an application by middle of December at the earliest. Gus Mitch Robinson 10/24/2000 01:02 PM To: Gus Eghneim/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Re: FW: Questions/Wheatland Thanks Gus. Does 4.g. look right? If so, do you have an estimated date? I'm assuming you're working on it, not Dave. Mitch From: Gus Eghneim on 10/24/2000 12:54 PM To: Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron cc: Chris Norris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gus Eghneim/Corp/Enron@Enron, Richard Broussard/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: FW: Questions/Wheatland Protocol for CEMS approval - CEMS must be installed, certified, and quality assured as per the acid rain requirements contained in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 75. The process involves performing a series of initial tests, including Relative accuracy test audits (RATAs), linearity checks, cycle/response time checks, and calibration drifts. It also involves significant recordkeeping and reporting requirements. Gus Mitch Robinson 10/24/2000 09:38 AM To: Chris Norris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Richard Broussard/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Gus Eghneim/Corp/Enron@Enron, Don Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: FW: Questions/Wheatland Please see comments in #4 below. Mitch ---------------------- Forwarded by Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron on 10/24/2000 09:31 AM --------------------------- Don Miller@ECT 10/24/2000 09:21 AM To: Ben Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT, Chris Norris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Jeffrey Keenan/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mike J Miller/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mitch Robinson/Corp/Enron@Enron, Stuart Zisman/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: FW: Questions < 4. Initial Wheatland Visit Questions: < < a. Please provide copies of the Westinghouse performance data. Rick, have we been able to come up with a summary sheet on the performance tests? < b. Confirm that all warranties are in name of LLC or transferable < to LLC. Stuart, this one is probably more in your bag. I would suggest that we state, all bidders should assume that warranties will be placed in the LLC's name prior to closing and that all warranties are fully transferable. (Note that currently, the warranties are not in the LLC's name, but are in ENA's name). < c. What is the protocol for CEMS approval. Gus, can you take a stab at this one? < d. Provide water quality test results. Don, this should now be in the DD room. < e. Provide all outage reports. Rick/Brent, do we have all of these? Any problem with providing them? < f. Provide overhaul budgeting. Don, not yet developed. Overhaul budgeting will be completed as any scheduled overhaul reaches the near-term horizon. Our method of budgeting for overhauls is to accrue maintenance dollars for every start (approx $1500 per start). We continually re-evaluate whether we are starts based or hours based. Currently, we remain starts based maintenance. < g. Provide copy of application for discharge permit. Application has not yet been submitted. We have only entered initial discussions with the state. We will submit the application once developed - - currently expected by xxxxx date (Gus, please verify this is true). < <
|