|
|
Enron Mail |
Response - There is not enough info. in item four for me to fully answer. I
also need to know what the content of document 2.02.12.G. However, I'll give it my best shot: The interconnect facilities upstream of the intersection of the lateral and N. Border's Manhattan Station are subject to FERC jurisdiction. N. Border completed the hot tap and interconnect facilities under its blanket authorization. I do not know what they mean by "the rest of the Lincoln facility". As for the question relating to the "outcome of the EIS process for the pipeline", do they mean the lateral or the interconnect facility? Fred Mitro 10/31/2000 08:16 AM To: Chris Meyer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dave Kellermeyer/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Lincoln - EIS issue Chris/Dave: Please take a look at question 4 in the attached file. It deals with the issue of whether the 2000 Peaker Facilities or associated gas laterals are FERC jurisdictional facilities and/or require an EIS statement. My initial recollection is that such an EIS was not required for either the Lincoln plant or the attached gas pipeline. Let me know your thoughts with a cc to Ben Rogers. Thanks, Fred ---------------------- Forwarded by Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT on 10/31/2000 08:15 AM --------------------------- Benjamin Rogers 10/30/2000 06:49 PM To: Fred Mitro/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Fred: Could you take a stab at question 4 for us. We have no idea on this one. Thanks Ben
|