|
|
Enron Mail |
Here are the new Plano numbers and the revised Homestead numbers. Please
only use these for discussion and model purposes and not with client conversations. These are all indicative cost numbers. Give me a call if you have any questions. Thanks Ben 3-7998 ---------------------- Forwarded by Benjamin Rogers/HOU/ECT on 05/04/2000 02:27 PM --------------------------- Bruce Golden@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT 05/04/2000 02:08 PM To: Benjamin Rogers@ECT cc: Subject: Plano vs Homestead Ben This is a revised Plano we did late yesterday. It was adjusted from Lowell, Mass Nepco estimate and we changed format to more closely match Homestead form. Biggest differences 'tween original Plano and original Homestead were: Homestead had dual fuel +4M Homestead had additional piling and foundation bulks +1.8M Homestead was connecting to a complicated t-line config +1.5M Homestead had an FPL substation +5M Homestead did not need as much gas pipeline -2.1M Homestead used 6% margin +4.4M Homestead had lower capacity due to additional chilling +1.5% (not capital cost but does change $/kW) Differences from original Plano to new Plano is that Nepco has estimated a union job for Lowell. This impacts indirects upward by about $5M and construction up above my earlier guesstimate by about $4M. I had doubled the cost per manhour which Nepco also did but additionally they added manhours for productivity loss. Additionally I moved new Plano margin to 6%. New Homestead went up due to raw water pretreatment and first stage RO but we dropped the substation cost so total estimated cost went down by a coupla of million. Numbers still just should be used for screening, no commitment. These summaries should not be passed around. Bruce
|