Enron Mail

From:shari.stack@enron.com
To:elizabeth.sager@enron.com
Subject:Cal PX indmentity agreement
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Thu, 19 Oct 2000 06:05:00 -0700 (PDT)

FYI
----- Forwarded by Shari Stack/HOU/ECT on 10/19/00 01:03 PM -----

Christian Yoder
10/19/00 12:50 PM

To: Tracy Ngo/PDX/ECT@ECT, Shari Stack/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve C Hall/PDX/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Cal PX indmentity agreement

The CalPX "Credit Redisign" situation is an irritating mess that I am trying
to help straighten out. Here is a summary of what is going on. Please keep
this summary around and read it every time you get a question from a confused
individual and feel free to forward it to whomever out there is confused
about things.

The CalPX has a Surety bond with a big Surety entity. The gist of the thing
is that If the PX ever gets into a situation where one of the players on its
exchange defaults, it can pick up the phone and call the Surety and the
Surety will rush money to the PX withing 5 minutes, no questions asked.
Before the Surety agreed to do this bond with the PX they insisted that all
of the players that do business with the PX (called principals) sign
indemnity agreements with it. The indemnity agreements basically say that if
the Surety ever has to pay a penny to the PX,, it can immediately call the
Principal and the principal will rush a penny to the Surety within 5.1
minutes. The indemnity agreement says that the Principal must pay the Surety
upon demand for the share of the loss that it caused. It also says a bunch
of stuff that makes it very clear that we might also have to pay money in
situations that are not our fault too. It is a risky, bad agreement to sign
and in the first round of this stuff with the PX a year or so ago we did not
sign any indemnity agreement. What happened instead was that Enron Corp
stepped in and saved the day. It just so happens that Enron Corp. already
had a preexisting Indemnity Agreement with the Surety covering various
exposures at the 20,000 foot corporate level. I was able to get the Enron
Corp bond people to talk to the Surety and the result was a two sentence
letter from the PX saying we were okay to trade. We did not have to sign the
indemnity agreement. I did not negotiate any of the terms between Corp and
the PX on this.

That is the history. Now we come to the PX's new "Credit Redisign." The PX
is anxious that it is not covered well enough. So, out they come with
exactly the same set of documents demanding that everybody sign another
indemnity agreement. Like a trained dog, I have just been trying to do the
same thing I did last time. I have called Corp and tried to get them to make
the issue go away the same way they did last time. Unfortunately there are
different people involved now and I have not been very aggressive about
telling the story and getting eveybody to work together. I am now back from
a nice littel vacation and promise to push the thing through Corp. as best I
can. I have already left two voice mails and will faithfully and doggedly
try to take care of this. ----cgy