Enron Mail |
Leonardo - Please be aware that the Wheatland IL peaking facility which was
to support this EOL capacity product is being sold -- therefore EPMI no longer seeks to roll out this exact product. The Power Desk will consider whether they want to proceed with some variant of the online capacity product, and if so, will advise us. Please contact me with any questions, and thanks for your help. --David ----- Forwarded by David Portz/HOU/ECT on 12/01/2000 10:32 AM ----- David Portz 08/15/2000 11:33 AM To: Leonardo Pacheco/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Capacity Generation Auction on EOL Leonardo I understand and share the desire for a simple website, but have several times indicated that these are not GTC terms, but tailored to this product offering (and any subsequent capacity products to be offered), and it is therefore legal's belief that they should appear within the website itself. Please keep me updated as to the progress on the product, as it occurs. Thanks. David Leonardo Pacheco@ENRON 08/15/2000 10:55 AM To: David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Capacity Generation Auction on EOL David, Sorry for not replying to your message before. All of our resources are still focused on the next phase of EnronOnline, thus we have had to delay all new products and new auctions development. We should be ready to start working on your auction in a couple of weeks. I agree that we had discussed the "contract section" before however, when I passed it through David Forster he did not like the format (legal wording). The reason for this is that we like to keep a same format an all of EnronOnline's offerings. Would it be possible to move this section to the GTC? We can always refer the clauses to the contracts. We would like to keep the contract section a easy-to-read as possible. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks again for your help! Leonardo Pacheco ext. 39938 David Portz@ECT 08/15/2000 10:35 AM To: Leonardo Pacheco/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Edward D Baughman/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Capacity Generation Auction on EOL Leonardo -- I haven't heard from you since this exchange of e-mails and am merely confirming with you that progress is underway on this product offering. --David Portz __________________ Leonardo -- I had addressed this with you in a telephone conversation on 7/18/00: The provisions would be part of an individual confirmation for this transaction, and are customized from similar provisions in underlying documents, rather than being verbatim repetitions. Three attorneys in the legal group had collaboratied to identitfy these provisions as those necessarily appearing in the website text. Please call me with any further questions. --David Leonardo Pacheco@ENRON 07/18/2000 01:42 PM To: David Portz/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Capacity Generation Auction on EOL David, Thanks for the text. I reviewed it and think that there is only one major issue outstanding: Additional Contract Terms: The clauses of this section seem to be extracted directly from a contract. They look like they are verbatim from a legal document. As you all know, the idea of the website text is to inform and guide your customers through the whole process. We need to substitute the current clauses with easy to read highlights appropriate to the web page. We can always refer the clauses to the contracts. We would like to keep this section a easy-to-read as possible. A good example of the "Contract Section" is the one used for the Emission Auctions. Please review and let me know if you have any questions or comments. Thank you very much for your help! Leonardo Pacheco ext. 39938
|