Enron Mail

From:elizabeth.sager@enron.com
To:alice.wright@enron.com, genia.fitzgerald@enron.com,travis.mccullough@enron.com, marcus.nettelton@enron.com
Subject:FW: Afghani-American writer Tamim Ansary
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:35:16 -0700 (PDT)


This was sent to me by a friend in NY - I thought it was a helpful

Elizabeth Sager
713-853-6349

-----Original Message-----
From: "Brock, Alex" <abrock@PoloRalphLauren.com<@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Brock+2C+20Alex+22+20+3Cabrock+40PoloRalphLauren+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 8:55 AM
To: 'caroline brock'; 'cathleen summersinseattle'; 'charlie'; 'Chi Sager'; 'gail'; 'Gerry Brock'; 'george'; 'jacqueline'; Sager, Elizabeth; 'Nina'; 'sstreet'; 'willy'
Subject: FW: Afghani-American writer Tamim Ansary


I think so too...
-----Original Message-----
From: Bridget Mulvey [SMTP:bmulvey@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 12:00 AM
To: car@agiweb.org; Cdmulvey@aol.com; cy3k@yahoo.com; kmulvey@MANDTBANK.COM; sahuson@bsuvc.bsu.edu; olliver@nscl.msu.edu; liebert6@aol.com; HHurley5@aol.com; jen_mapes@yahoo.com; kbell64@hotmail.com; rechlin@okstate.edu; bluedvls11@yahoo.com; mgv99@geneseo.edu; gparatore@hotmail.com; MRB9610@geo.tamu.edu; husonrl@eas.slu.edu; roopastarz@yahoo.com; sjlangton@hotmail.com; michele.olsen@colorado.edu; stmulvey@MtHolyoke.edu; sjockman@netscape.net; stevedahlberg@hotmail.com; nayabird@hotmail.com; emugym@hotmail.com
Subject: Fwd: Afghani-American writer Tamim Ansary
Hi guys. This is really good. My friend Anjali sent this to me and, well,
it's worth reading. I wish you all the best. Have a good week.
-Bridget
<I thought this was a very thought-provoking piece...
<Anjali
<
<<< < The following was sent to me by my friend Tamim Ansary. Tamim is an
<<<Afghani-American writer. He is also one of the most brilliant people I
<<<know in this life. When he writes, I read. When he talks, I listen.
<<<Here is his take on Afghanistan and the whole mess we are in.
<-Gary T.
<<< <
<<< < *****
<<< <
<<< <
<I've been hearing a lot of talk about "bombing Afghanistan back to the
<Stone Age." Ronn Owens, on KGO Talk Radio today, allowed that this would
<mean killing innocent people, people who had nothing to do with this
<atrocity, but "we're at war, we have to accept collateral damage. What else
<can we do?" Minutes later I heard some TV pundit discussing whether we
<"have the belly to do what must be done."
<
<And I thought about the issues being raised especially hard because I am
<from Afghanistan, and even though I've lived here for 35 years I've never
<lost track of what's going on there. So I want to tell anyone who will
<listen how it all looks from where I'm standing.
<
<I speak as one who hates the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden. There is no doubt
<in my mind that these people were responsible for the atrocity in New York.
<I agree that something must be done about those monsters.
<
<But the Taliban and Ben Laden are not Afghanistan. They're not even the
<government of Afghanistan. The Taliban are a cult of ignorant
<psychotics who took over Afghanistan in 1997. Bin Laden is a political
<criminal with a plan. When you think Taliban, think Nazis. When you think
<Bin Laden, think Hitler. And when you think "the people of Afghanistan"
<think "the Jews in the concentration camps." It's not only that the
<Afghan people had nothing to do with this atrocity. They were the first
<victims of the perpetrators. They would exult if someone would come in
<there, take out the Taliban and clear out the rats nest of
<international thugs holed up in their country.
<
<Some say, why don't the Afghans rise up and overthrow the Taliban? The
<answer is, they're starved, exhausted, hurt, incapacitated, suffering. A
<few years ago, the United Nations estimated that there are 500,000
<disabled orphans in Afghanistan--a country with no economy, no food. There
<are millions of widows. And the Taliban has been burying these
<widows alive in mass graves. The soil is littered with land mines, the
<farms were all destroyed by the Soviets. These are a few of the reasons
<why the Afghan people have not overthrown the Taliban.
<
<We come now to the question of bombing Afghanistan back to the Stone Age.
<Trouble is, that's been done. The Soviets took care of it already.
<Make the Afghans suffer? They're already suffering. Level their houses?
<Done. Turn their schools into piles of rubble? Done. Eradicate their
<hospitals? Done. Destroy their infrastructure? Cut them off from medicine
<and health care? Too late. Someone already did all that.
<
<New bombs would only stir the rubble of earlier bombs. Would they at least
<get the Taliban? Not likely. In today's Afghanistan, only the Taliban eat,
<only they have the means to move around. They'd slip away
<and hide. Maybe the bombs would get some of those disabled orphans, they
<don't move too fast, they don't even have wheelchairs. But flying over
<Kabul and dropping bombs wouldn't really be a strike against the criminals
<who did this horrific thing. Actually it would only be making
<common cause with the Taliban--by raping once again the people they've
<been raping all this time
<
<So what else is there? What can be done, then? Let me now speak with
<true fear and trembling. The only way to get Bin Laden is to go in there
<with ground troops. When people speak of "having the belly to do
<what needs to be done" they're thinking in terms of having the belly to
<kill as many as needed. Having the belly to overcome any moral qualms
<about killing innocent people. Let's pull our heads out of the sand.
<What's actually on the table is Americans dying. And not just because some
<Americans would die fighting their way through Afghanistan to Bin
<Laden's hideout. It's much bigger than that folks. Because to get any
<troops to Afghanistan, we'd have to go through Pakistan. Would
<they let us? Not likely. The conquest of Pakistan would have to be first.
<Will other Muslim nations just stand by? You see where I'm going. We're
<flirting with a world war between Islam and the West.
<
<And guess what: that's Bin Laden's program. That's exactly what he
<wants. That's why he did this. Read his speeches and statements. It's all
<right there. He really believes Islam would beat the west. It might
<
<seem ridiculous, but he figures if he can polarize the world into Islam
<and the West, he's got a billion soldiers. If the west wreaks a holocaust
<in those lands, that's a billion people with nothing left to lose, that's
<even better from Bin Laden's point of view. He's probably
<wrong, in the end the west would win, whatever that would mean, but the
<war would last for years and millions would die, not just theirs but
<ours. Who has the belly for that? Bin Laden does. Anyone else?
<
<Tamim Ansary
<
<
_________________________________________________________________
Descargue GRATUITAMENTE MSN Explorer en http://explorer.msn.es/intl.asp