Enron Mail

From:rcarroll@bracepatt.com
To:mary.hain@enron.com, richard.b.sanders@enron.com, tim.belden@enron.com
Subject:Additional Language
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Thu, 2 Mar 2000 10:15:00 -0800 (PST)

Richard,

As requested, below please find language that I recommend be included in the
Settlement. The first sentence preserves Enron's right to appeal the
findings of an ADR proceeding that may emanate out of this matter to FERC or
any competent court; as it turns out, this right is provided under Section
4.1 of the PX's Dispute Resolution Procedures. The second sentence is
intended to preserve Enron's right in other proceedings (as we have done
already) to challenge the legality of ISOs and PXs to conduct investigations
such as the one that they have in this instance:

"Nothing in this Settlement prejudices or limits Enron's rights under Section
4.1 of PX Tariff Schedule 9, Dispute Resolution Procedures, related to any
ADR proceeding that may address the same subjects that are addressed in this
Settlement. Moreover, although Enron has agreed not to seek review of the
decision and order issued by the Chief Executive Officer in this proceeding
based upon this Offer of Settlement, nothing in this Settlement prejudices
Enron's right in other proceedings to challenge the CalPX's right, under
United States federal law, the Federal Power Act, the Administrative
Procedures Act, and applicable FERC regulations and decisions, to investigate
allegations of improper market behavior and to issue findings and impose
sanctions related to such investigations."

Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. Ron