Enron Mail

From:jklauber@llgm.com
To:mark.e.haedicke@enron.com
Subject:El Paso FERC Case
Cc:richard.b.sanders@enron.com, robert.c.williams@enron.com, vsharp@enron.com
Bcc:richard.b.sanders@enron.com, robert.c.williams@enron.com, vsharp@enron.com
Date:Tue, 5 Jun 2001 02:21:00 -0700 (PDT)

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: SUBJECT TO ATTORNEY CLIENT AND OTHER PRIVILEGES

Mark:

I assume that you and Richard are very familiar with the day-to-day
developments in the heavily publicized FERC case involving the investigation
by FERC of El Paso's sale of pipeline capacity into the CA market to its
merchant arm last year that CA officials have partly blamed for the spike in
gas and power prices. As you know, this is the case where the highest
executives of El Paso recently were called to testify at FERC.

An article in this morning's New York Times (which begins on page 1), in
discussing El Paso's significant earnings generated by the El Paso merchant
arm from the pipeline capacity purchase, says that the parties with which El
Paso hedged its position also made sizeable profits. The article notes that
about half of El Paso's trades were with Enron "according to people present
at the briefings El Paso officials have given to California officials."
While this probably is not surprising in light of our size and breadth in the
market, it nonetheless is made to sound somewhat sinister, and my sense is
that it is just another potential barb for the CA officials to throw at us.
Since the article quotes a response from Mark Palmer (in which he suggests
that Enron, in turn, likely would have resold the capacity and would not have
realized the benefit of the rising market), I assumed that you were aware of
it, but I thought I would err on the side of putting an extra e-mail in your
in-box.

John

John Klauberg
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P.
212 424-8125
john.klauberg@llgm.com


==============================================================================
This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidential
and may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges. This
e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended to
be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not an intended
recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify me.
The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this
e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful.

==============================================================================