ExxonMobil v. EGP, et al.

I need this printed out on my stationary ASAP fri morning. Thanks
----- Forwarded by Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT on 09/28/2000 05:48 PM -----

Britt Davis@ENRON
09/28/2000 12:10 PM

To: Jim Armogida/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Michael Moran/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Robert Vote/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Rockey Storie/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Becky
Zikes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: ExxonMobil v. EGP, et al.

Gentlemen:

As I mentioned in my earlier e-mail of this morning, I attach the latest
versions of the letter to ExxonMobil and the chronology. Again, I have
deliberately softened the tone in the last paragraph of page 2 of the letter
to wire around a potential problem caused by a 1995 letter from us to Mobil
in the past about the role of ELSC. We have also redrafted both the letter
and chronology to reflect that the ELP, LP was a publicly traded company, so
KN acquired only Enron's interest in it, not all of it. We last redrafted
the chronology to reflect that the partnership never actually owned the
hydrocarbon recovery plant.

Mike has briefly reviewed these drafts and I understand has no problem with
them (although I am resending them to him for him to review again if he
wishes).

Jim and Richard, once I have your respective comments/go ahead, I will send
this to Eric Nichols by telefax this afternoon. I will also give Nichols a
heads-up that it is coming.

I await your response.

Britt