Enron Mail

From:gfergus@brobeck.com
To:djn@pkns.com, jfrizzell@gibbs-bruns.com, pmeringolo@brobeck.com,dcastro@pkns.com, richard.b.sanders@enron.com, sbishop@gibbs-bruns.com
Subject:FW: Enron
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Wed, 13 Dec 2000 01:22:00 -0800 (PST)

FYI.

Thanks.
Gary

< -----Original Message-----
< From: Lamb, Daniel G.
< Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 5:34 PM
< To: Fergus, Gary S.
< Subject: Enron
<
< Gary, I just received a call from Doug Tribble at P,M&S. He is
< representing Dynergy in both the Hendricks and the Gordon litigation. He
< wanted to know if we could represent Morgan, Stanley. When he learned
< that we were representing Enron, he invited us to join the joint defense
< group that has been formed among the Gordon defendants, subject to
< approval of the other defendants. That group is
< made up of the following:
<
< Reliant - Baker & Botts/Luce, Forward (Steiner)
<
< AES Corp. - Williams & Connelly/Dicks & Shapiro
<
< NRG Energy - Sheppard, Mullin
<
< Southern Company - White & Case/Trautman, Sanders
<
< Williams Energy - Gray, Cary/Jones, Day
<
< So far as I know, Duke Energy and PG&E are not represented yet.
<
< Doug says his group has already filed a low number/related case petition
< to get the Hendricks case transferred to Mac Amos from Myers. The group
< also plans to remove the Gordon case on federal question grounds based on
< some group research they have done. They would like to remove the
< Hendricks case at about the same time, but haven't been able to line up
< all of the defendants. I assume that was part of the reason for his call
< and his request that we represent Morgan, Stanley. Apparently an earlier
< case filed against SDG&E was removed and assigned to Judge Gonzales. If
< Hendricks and Gordon are removed, they will be low numbered to Gonzales.
< She is one of the better federal judges, but she has some shortcomings
< that we should talk about.
<
< Anyway, it looks like teams are forming, and we should think about
< coordinating with them. I asked Doug to send me a copy of the joint
< defense agreement they are circulating, but he could not do so without the
< other defendants' approval. They are concerned about including Sempra's
< counsel in their group, and therefore haven't included any Hendricks
< defendants who are not also in Gordon.
<
< Dan

=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of
the original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to
postmaster@brobeck.com
BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP
http://www.brobeck.com