Enron Mail

From:btyndall@beattylaw.com
To:richard.b.sanders@enron.com, nmanne@susmangodfrey.com
Subject:Forward: Message from Kenneth Roberts regarding being neutral arbitrator
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Fri, 12 Jan 2001 05:30:00 -0800 (PST)

-----Original Message-----
From:?? Beatty, Michael L.
Sent:?? Friday, January 12, 2001 11:45 AM
To:???? Tyndall, Barbara
Subject:??????? FW: Kindly advise regarding participation as a neutral
arbitrator




Mr. Beatty:

I could be interested in being a neutral in your case. I would need to know
more about the case.? For example I would want to know the nature of the
dispute, how long the hearing will likely last, where the hearing will be
held, whether the other arbitrators are neutrals and other similar
information.

However, for reasons described below I do not think I am a very good
candidate.

As to availability, I am tied up all of this month and I will be out of the
country all of February and part of March. I will be free much of May and
June and I may also have most of April open but I cannot be sure of April at
this time.

As for conflicts, I do not believe I have any but I have disclosures to make.
I have known Charles Renfrew for a long time. I was Vice-President and
General Counsel of Exxon and Mr. Renfrew had a similar position with Chevron.
I worked with him on a variety of projects for The American Petroleum
Institute and we have been members of The Association of General Counsel and
other organizations. I have seen him at social affairs periodically. I
believe the last occasion was about 18 months ago when we had dinner
together.

I have also known the General Counsel of Enron for some years. We have been
members of various general counsel groups including The Association of
General Counsel.? We are currently Members of the Board of the University of
Texas law School Foundation. I usually see him several times each year.

I am currently acting as an Independent Legal Advisor in a matter involving
Chevron and a Department of the United States Government. This involves a
project of the parties to unwind a joint operation. It is a project that has
lasted several years and is not yet complete. As the Independent Legal
Advisor I am called in when a legal issue arises--usually over a contract
interpretation. At that time I act first as a Mediator and if there is no
settlement, I become an Arbitrator.

I mention this situation because of Mr. Renfrew's association with Chevron. I
do not know if he has any current involvement with Chevron but in any event I
do not believe there is any conflict. However, I would not become a
co-arbitrator with Mr. Renfrew without discussing this with representatives
of Chevron and the US Department. I doubt that either party would object but
whether Mr. Renfrew is a neutral might be of interest to them.

Right now I am in the process of reading briefs and drafting an award in the
most recent arbitration involving those parties. I would not even want to
contact them until that work is finished and the award issued.

For all of the reasons stated above, I request that you take my name from
your list of potential arbitrators. If you should in due course have trouble
agreeing on a third arbitrator (which is highly unlikely since many very
goods ones will be available) and wish to have further dialogue with me we
can revisit the matter.

Thank you for considering me.

Regards

Kenneth Roberts