In re ICTS

I apologize for accidentally hitting the wrong button and sending the below
e-mail. Here's the rest of my e-mail:

1. (cont'd.) and any other form language typically used.

2. confirmation that MG Metals indeed paid the freight to ICTS in advance for
all the shipments to Scottsborough.

3. copies of anything that MG Metals has received in the past from this
carrier, ICTS or Scottsborough regarding these particular dispute.

I will keep you closely advised.

Britt

----- Forwarded by Britt Davis/Corp/Enron on 12/06/2000 02:47 PM -----

Britt Davis
12/06/2000 02:47 PM

To: Nicole Dion/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON
cc: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Zikes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
Subject: In re ICTS

I have received a telefax from Scottsborough, our good customer, which
attaches the lawsuit filed by the trucker against it and ICTS, in Alabama
state court. The complaint prays for recovery of about $15,000, plus
interest and attorneys' fees. I was not sent the service papers, which would
allow me to confirm Scottsborough's advice that its "return date" is December
16 (a Saturday, so it can't be right). I was not sent any documents that
would allow me to confirm Scottsborough's representation that all the loads
(which were allegedly shipped from 4/10-5/23/00) were purchased from MG
Metals, freight prepaid.

I am sending a follow-up letter to Scottsborough asking for specific
additional documentation, including the service papers; you will be
blind-copied on the letter. I will also have Becky, my legal assistant, (a)
call the Court to see if process has been issued against ICTS and whether it
has been served and (b) check on Pacer, the federal bankruptcy database, to
see if ICTS has filed for bankruptcy.

Meanwhile, I wonder if Nicole could advise me of/send me the following:

1. a copy of the MG Metals/Scottsborough master agreement, if there is one,