Enron Mail |
Michel,
I have your urgent message below. This is the first that I have heard that you needed two originals to file. Luckily, I have an extra set of originals, which I will tonight give to Federal Express to courier to Bernard's office, assuming that the jets are flying despite the freezing weather/sleet that is expected in Houston tonight. If the jets are flying, I assume that Bernard will get the originals by Thursday. I would appreciate Bernard's office advising me by the close of business in Paris Thursday whether they have received this package. Parenthetically, I repeat my two prior requests that I be advised as soon as possible what qualifications are necessary for a liquidator, so that we can speedily substitute someone in and for the place of John Echols, who has signed the originals we are now using only with my promise that we would speedily find a substitute. Based on Bernard's advice, I told Echols that this could be done within 60 days. Echols signed the documents on December 5. I accordingly anticipate that you and Bernard will be working with me to get the substitution accomplished by no later than Monday, February 5, 2001. I have made myself personally responsible to my clients that this will be accomplished timely. Britt ----- Forwarded by Britt Davis/Corp/Enron on 12/12/2000 08:33 AM ----- "bouthonnet.michel" <bouthonnet.michel@wanadoo.fr< 12/12/2000 04:27 AM Please respond to "bouthonnet.michel" To: <Britt.Davis@enron.com< cc: Subject: VERY URGENT TO BRITT DAVIS ? ? ??????? Dear BRITT, ? ? ??????? Bernard gave me only one copy of the documents I sent you about the renewal of John Echols as liquidator of EGLE. ? ??????? The court of commerce needs two copies. It is of the utmost importance to get at least another copy duly signed of : ? ??????? - Liquidator report ??????? - General meeting dated december 4/2000. ? ??????? Do not hesitate to call me if necessary. ? ??????? Best Regards. ? ? ? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Michel BOUTHONNET
|