![]() |
Enron Mail |
We have put together the following list of issues for the request for
rehearing of the FERC's November 15 order. We would appreciate your input about whether to pursue these issues and we will still have to decide who will write up the various issues (Alan, Bracewell, WPTF, or EPSA). Requests for rehearing are due on January 14, 2001. We oppose doing away with the opportunity cost standard under the soft cap and not establishing a standard of reasonable profit $150 cap too low (is there any point in raising this issue again?) Benchmarks for forward contracts - The FERC should clarify that it will not be applying this to anything other than Cal IOU contracts. The FERC should clarify its statement that "to the extent the IOUs' resources exceed their load at various times, they are free to sell any surplus at wholesale, pursuant to their Commission-filed rates schedules." A literal interpretation of this sentence will limit liquidity in the market and prohibit the IOUs from taking advantage of spreads between where their generation and load is located. We don't care about the IOUs trading options but we are concerned about less liquidity. Commission's findings concerning exercise of market power (and PUC's request for protective order) - This issue is a placeholder pending input from Richard Sanders and Robin Gibbs. We oppose the 27-month refund period We oppose allowing the state a role in governance (WPTF) The FERC should not have rejected Dynegy & Reliant complaint concerning being paid the cost of cover for exports
|