Enron Mail

From:matthias.lee@enron.com
To:john.nowlan@enron.com
Subject:MT Pacific Valour
Cc:russell.aeria@enron.com, sheila.foo@enron.com, alan.aronowitz@enron.com,richard.sanders@enron.com, stuart.bland@enron.com, anita.fam@enron.com, angeline.poon@enron.com
Bcc:russell.aeria@enron.com, sheila.foo@enron.com, alan.aronowitz@enron.com,richard.sanders@enron.com, stuart.bland@enron.com, anita.fam@enron.com, angeline.poon@enron.com
Date:Tue, 16 Nov 1999 07:35:00 -0800 (PST)

John

It seems the fates were against us meeting up! you were in Singapore while I
was in Houston. I really do hope we get to meet up sooner rather than later.

I did get the chance to meet with Stuart and had what I thought was a very
fruitful discussion on, among other tings, MT Pacific Valour. I hope you have
both had the chance to speak about it since. I understand Richard has been
trying to catch you to discuss the matter as well, but both your busy
schedules have prevented it.

Richard and I would very much like to get your take on the situation at
present. Whilst it is clear that if a commercial solution is met with Hyundai
we would not be able to claim against our contracting counterparty under the
C/P, I understand from Stuart that a commercial solution may not be in the
offing. If so, our option would be to commence arbitration against the
contracting counterparty under the C/P .Present information indicate the
contracting counterparty to be MTM Shipmanagement which has substantial
assets sufficient to meet our claim (which is relatively small although not
insignificant). Arresting the vessel would therefore not be necessary since
it is simply a tool to obtain security for the claim.

Hope to hear from you soon.

Regards

Matt