|
|
Enron Mail |
-----Original Message-----
From: Gay, Rob Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 9:32 AM To: Weidler, Peter; Daniels, Eddy; Bestard, Jose; Powell, Laine; Novak, John Subject: RE: Strictly privileged & confidential I had a call today with the John Gardiner of Sadden and Fernando Serec at Tozzini about various issues including a response to the Furnas letter. John will circulate a draft response which we believe should be a brief acknowledgement of receipt, with the notation that EPE still considers Furnas in default and extends the period to cure another 30 days. The Furnas letter seems to us to indicate that Furnas is preparing for litigation, hence we do not intend to respond to each point which could cause deterioration of negotiations, plus it limits our ability to change positions later if we want to. I also don't want to get into a letter writing battle which is not particularly productive. Let's plan to send the letter a week from Monday to give everyone time to review and comment and it buys us a little more time. Next week is Carnaval anyway. Please call me with any questions x56159. Regards, Michelle ---------------------- Forwarded by Rob G Gay/NA/Enron on 02/22/2001 04:37 AM --------------------------- "Boehm, Barbara" <bboeh@opic.gov< on 02/21/2001 06:23:42 PM To: "'Rob.G.Gay@enron.com'" <Rob.G.Gay@enron.com< cc: "'Kluesener, Frank'" <frank.kluesener@kfw.de< Subject: RE: Commitment extension Thanks for the update. The sooner the better I think; it would be helpful for us to know what defaults exist as we assess the whole "consent" situation. Thanks Barbara -----Original Message----- From: Rob.G.Gay@enron.com [SMTP:Rob.G.Gay@enron.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 10:54 AM To: Boehm, Barbara; Kluesener, Frank Subject: Re: Commitment extension Yes, we have not been able to pull Laine and Jose away from their very important activities on the Ridges, the Siemens negotiation and the Furnas/ Brazil Inc. efforts. I think Eddie Daniels is going to try and start pulling the scedule together this week and next. Thanks for the follow up. Please let me know if the passage of time is endangering this effort. Regards, Rob "Boehm, Barbara" <bboeh@opic.gov< on 02/20/2001 05:44:24 PM To: "'rob.g.gay@enron.com'" <rob.g.gay@enron.com< cc: Subject: Commitment extension Rob I forgot to ask you about this this morning: can you please give me an update on the status of Amendment #2 (the commitment extension). I believe we are waiting for an update of the attached schedule. Thanks Barbara
|