|
|
Enron Mail |
It seems to me that we should start the process of figuring out what
"David Noonan" <djn@pkns.com< 01/26/2001 02:20 PM To: <GFergus@brobeck.com< cc: <richard.b.sanders@enron.com<, <apickens@gibbs-bruns.com<, <rgibbs@gibbs-bruns.com<, <enron.com.dcastro.jfrizzel@pkns.com<, "Michael Kirby" <mlk@pkns.com< Subject: Enron-- Tom Lambert Gary: I received a voicemail message from Tom Lambert this morning. He advised that he had been retained by Dan Lamb for Enron as an expert but now understood that he should be talking to me and not Dan. Parenthetically, I know Tom quite well having used him on a number of cases. He wanted an update on what was happening and then stated that he had been contacted by a number of other defendants including Sempra but acknowledged that he had already been retained by Enron. I sense that he is looking for an assurance that he has a real role in this case before its too late. Tom is basically a one-man shop and this case therefore is probably pretty significant for him in terms of a revenue source and he doesn't want to get left on the sidelines. I haven't called him back yet and want to know what I can tell him about his role or level of involvment for Enron. Please advise or give me a call if you want to discuss. Thanks. Dave The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying documents is subject to the attorney-client privilege and/or the attorney work product rule and is confidential business information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or representative of the recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify Kathryn A. Pugh at kpugh@pkns.com and immediately delete this message from your system.
|