![]() |
Enron Mail |
I would involve Michelle Cash or someone in Enron Corp who deals with
labor/employment issues. I am surprised this issue has not come up before. Peter Keohane 02/27/2001 06:06 PM To: James Derrick/Enron@EnronXGate cc: Mark E Haedicke/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Litigation Counsel Jim, we have a former employee who tried to exercise options which had expired on the 31st day after employment termination, as the 30th day provided for in the grant agreement was a Sunday. Paine Webber refused and she then asked us to honour the obligation in any event or to change her employment termination date. In consultation with Enron Corp. (Mary Joyce and Michael Fauerbacher) the request was denied. She has now sued both Enron Canada Corp. and Enron Corp. in the Alberta courts. The amount is not large ($US27,000) but he principle and precedent value is. I think our position is very strong but there are some issues around the calculation of days from termination and performance required on non-business days (which is not provided for in the grant agreements). I have a call with Mary Joyce and Michael Fauerbacher of Enron Corp. tomorrow and was going to involve litigation counsel - Dalton McGrath - a partner at Blake Cassels and Graydon who is in my estimation very effective and aggressive. Is this OK with you and/or do we need to involve outside counsel in Houston to monitor Enron Corp.'s interests? Please let me know your thoughts. Thanks and regards, Peter.
|