Enron Mail

From:matthias.lee@enron.com
To:alan.aronowitz@enron.com
Subject:Re: "PACIFIC VALOUR"
Cc:anita.fam@enron.com, angeline.poon@enron.com, richard.sanders@enron.com
Bcc:anita.fam@enron.com, angeline.poon@enron.com, richard.sanders@enron.com
Date:Fri, 1 Oct 1999 02:34:00 -0700 (PDT)

Alan

Russell says he would like to go through his recorded conversations with
Hyundai to refresh his memory. He has asked to the meeting with WFW to be on
Tuesday (5 Oct). I will try to schedule Suzanne's and Neale's attendance for
Tuesday, and update you after the meeting.

Matt





Alan Aronowitz
09/30/99 10:11 PM
To: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT
cc: Anita Fam/SIN/ECT@ECT, Angeline Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT, Richard B
Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: "PACIFIC VALOUR"

Matt:

Please advise as to any update after Neale/Suzanne soeak with Russell and
Sheila reagrding the conversations with Hyundai. Thanks.



Matthias Lee
09/29/99 08:23 PM
To: Alan Aronowitz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Anita Fam/SIN/ECT@ECT
cc: Angeline Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT
Subject: "PACIFIC VALOUR"

FYI.

Matt
---------------------- Forwarded by Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT on 09/30/99 09:15 AM
---------------------------


akwan@wfw.com on 09/29/99 06:57:30 PM
To: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT
cc: ngregson@wfw.com, sbainbridge@wfw.com

Subject: "PACIFIC VALOUR"



Dear Matt

I refer to our discussions today. We have reviewed the transcript between
Russell and Hyundai, together with the cited case which neatly summarises many
of the principles of repudiation and affirmation.

On its own, we do not consider that the transcript changes the position. (We
are assuming that this conversation was the last before parties began to
communicate only in writing). Although we agree that Hyundai's position is
somewhat equivocal in this fax, it was superceded by later written
correspondence which gives a timeframe for Hyundai to affirm the contract or
accept Enron's breach. The later responses from Hyundai seems clear in its
acceptance of repudiation.

However, both Neale and I think it might be a good idea if we speak with
Russell
and Sheila together with you (perhaps with a view to taking short statements
from them). If both their views are that Hyundai were equivocal in various
conversations and given Hyundai's earlier rather relaxed attitude to vessel
nomination, there may be some scope for constructing a stronger case that they
elected to affirm the contract.

If this suits, both Neale and I would be free Friday morning or late
afternoon.

Best regards

Suzanne