![]() |
Enron Mail |
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, ATTORNEY WORK
PRODUCT Attached for your review and approval is a proposed response to Mitsubishi's recently-received position in this matter (which is basically that we need to pay the freight and demurrage immediately--no surprise). Matt, David Best and I recommend that it be sent to Mitsubishi and ask for the necessary authority to do so. I await your response. Britt ----- Forwarded by Britt Davis/Corp/Enron on 08/18/2000 08:14 AM ----- Matthias Lee@ECT 08/17/2000 08:19 PM To: Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Deborah Shahmoradi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brenda McAfee/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Angeline Poon/SIN/ECT@ECT, Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: PACIFIC VIRGO Britt I agree with David's draft (save that "Batangas" is misspelt). Thanks, and I look forward to getting your "go ahead". Regards Matt From: Britt Davis@ENRON on 08/17/2000 09:41 PM To: Matthias Lee/SIN/ECT@ECT cc: Deborah Shahmoradi/NA/Enron@Enron, Brenda McAfee/Corp/Enron@ENRON Subject: PACIFIC VIRGO PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT Matt, would you let me know if this meets with your approval? Once you advise that it does, I will pass it around for the necessary authority here in Houston. Thanks. Britt ----- Forwarded by Britt Davis/Corp/Enron on 08/17/2000 08:33 AM ----- Julie.Bertschin@clyde.co.uk 08/17/2000 08:13 AM To: Matthias.Lee@enron.com cc: Britt.Davis@enron.com, ngregson@wfw.com Subject: PACIFIC VIRGO Suggest the following: "We wish to respond to your fax messages of 11th August with regard to your claims for freight and demurrage. We note you have elected to refer both claims to arbitration. Please note that we have earlier elected for arbitration also in respect of our claims. We repeat our earlier message of 7th August that you review your entitlement to freight and demurrage after the joint testing of samples currently being assembled in Singapore. We shall also be reviewing our claim after the joint testing. Please note that we have already paid freight for the voyage to Betangus in keeping with the intention we expressed to you in our fax of 13th July which we note you attached to your recent demand. This was paid as a gesture of goodwill despite the evidence of contamination at the time. We take the view that it is reasonable to hold back any further payments and review your claims when the joint analysis results are known to all interested parties. On the subject of the joint analysis, kindly confirm the name of your technical representative who will be attending at the laboratory of SGS Singapore when the analysis is likely to take place. Our technical representatives are preparing a test programme and this will be sent to your appointed representative with an invitation to agree". I have put in the last paragraph assuming Mitsubishi has not nominated anyone yet. Regards David Best Clyde & Co PLEASE RESPOND TO : david.best@clyde.co.uk __________________________ This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Any views or opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Clyde & Co. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact Clyde & Co. Clyde & Co. 51 Eastcheap, London, EC3M 1JP Tel: +44 (020) 7623 1244, Fax: +44 (020) 7623 5427 Clyde & Co. Guildford Beaufort House, Chertsey Street, Guildford GU1 4HA Tel: +44 1483 555 555, Fax: +44 1483 567 330 E-Mail: postmaster@clyde.co.uk, Internet: http://www.clydeco.com
|