Enron Mail

From:susan.mara@enron.com
To:wanda.curry@enron.com
Subject:RE: PG&E
Cc:diann.huddleson@enron.com, michael.tribolet@enron.com, c..williams@enron.com,b..sanders@enron.com, lisa.mellencamp@enron.com, d..steffes@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com
Bcc:diann.huddleson@enron.com, michael.tribolet@enron.com, c..williams@enron.com,b..sanders@enron.com, lisa.mellencamp@enron.com, d..steffes@enron.com, jeff.dasovich@enron.com
Date:Wed, 24 Oct 2001 09:56:59 -0700 (PDT)

I reviewed the document and it seems fairly accurate. I have a slight disa=
greement with one statement, as follows: "The Commission's reference to "su=
rcharge" can be interpreted to mean both the one cent and three cent surcha=
rges given that both surcharges were granted similar treatment in D.01-03-0=
82." I don't agree that this is so black and white. One can also take the=
interpretation that it was meant to apply only to the 3 cent and not to th=
e 1 cent surcharge. Obviously, SCE took the former interpretation and PG&E=
the latter. That is one reason why we have been very careful about attack=
ing this issue. AReM has protested PG&E charging the one cent surcharge a=
nd supported Edison's approach in responding to the advice letters filed mo=
nths ago. AReM continues to work with the CPUC staff to get the staff to s=
upport AReM when it responds to the advice letters. Be aware that there ar=
e strong forces working against ESPs and anything potentially favorable to =
them. The more we can accomplish this under the radar screen, the better of=
f we will be. Commissioner Wood is still attacking retroactivity and many h=
ave raised the "cost shifting" issue. In other words, we can still lose th=
e 3 cent exclusion. We have to be careful how we proceed.

-----Original Message-----
From: =09Curry, Wanda =20
Sent:=09Tuesday, October 23, 2001 7:28 PM
To:=09Mara, Susan
Subject:=09FW: PG&E

Lisa had asked that I give you a call re the attached file. I think you ar=
e the most knowledgeable to review it and provide comments. We will be usi=
ng this in the meeting with PG&E on Thursday.

Thanks,
Wanda

-----Original Message-----
From: =09Mellencamp, Lisa =20
Sent:=09Monday, October 22, 2001 9:49 AM
To:=09Curry, Wanda; Huddleson, Diann; Tribolet, Michael; Williams, Robert C=
.; Sanders, Richard B.
Subject:=09FW: PG&E


please let me know if any of you disagree/have comments
-----Original Message-----
From: =09Simmons, Linda J. =20
Sent:=09Friday, October 19, 2001 3:49 PM
To:=09Mellencamp, Lisa
Subject:=09FW: PG&E



-----Original Message-----
From: =09MDay <MDay@GMSSR.com<@ENRON =20
Sent:=09Friday, October 19, 2001 3:46 PM
To:=09Simmons, Linda J.
Subject:=09RE: PG&E

Here is our settlement sheet on the one cent surcharge, attached below.
Mike Day





- X28655.DOC [Mellencamp, Lisa] << File: X28655.DOC <<