|
|
Enron Mail |
Attached find Ron's outline of comments on the FERC's November 1 order in the
Section 206 proceeding. They are primarily legal arguments. Concerning his comments about the congestion management redesign - I'm not sure that we want to oppose LMP. I think instead we want to ensure that there are not a large number of nodes. Alan will be writing the technical comments on the $150 caps, not Seabron. Sue called me this morning and said IEP will not be contesting the $150 price cap. This is too bad because we had hoped they would carry the ball on arguing why $150 is not sufficient to incent peaking generation. Sue is working on IEP to try to get them to reconsider. I think we also need to make sure we make all of the arguments that relate to the CPUC's subpoena. I have asked Lysa Akin to set up a conference call about this ASAP with Richard, Dan, Gary Fergus, Me, Mike Day, Sue, and Jim. Please tell Lysa if I haven't listed you and you wish to be on this call. ---------------------- Forwarded by Mary Hain/HOU/ECT on 11/06/2000 09:27 AM --------------------------- Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. From: "Ronald Carroll" <rcarroll@bracepatt.com< 11/03/2000 02:58 PM To: <mary.hain@enron.com<, <smara@enron.com< cc: "Jeffrey Watkiss" <dwatkiss@bracepatt.com< Subject: Comments to November 1 Order I have enclosed my thoughts on which issues to address in our comments. - 0133539.01
|