|
|
Enron Mail |
MTS pleased to add his agreement
MTS From: Nicole Dion on 13/12/2000 13:30 CST To: Britt Davis/Corp/Enron@ENRON cc: Becky Zikes/Corp/Enron@Enron, Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@Enron, Martin Stanley/EU/Enron@Enron, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: In re ICTS/Alabama v. Scottsboro Britt, Entity should be Enron Metals & Commodity Ltd., since all our contracts and invoices are issued on behalf of Ltd. . If Scottsboro agree to sign this letter please go ahead. Nicole Dion Britt Davis 12/13/2000 12:27 PM To: Martin Stanley/EU/Enron@Enron, Nicole Dion/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON cc: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Zikes/Corp/Enron@ENRON Subject: In re ICTS/Alabama v. Scottsboro Apologies; here is the revised draft, with Marcus's suggested revisions. ----- Forwarded by Britt Davis/Corp/Enron on 12/13/2000 11:25 AM ----- Britt Davis 12/13/2000 11:25 AM To: Martin Stanley/EU/Enron@Enron, Nicole Dion/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON cc: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Zikes/Corp/Enron@ENRON Subject: In re ICTS/Alabama v. Scottsboro Attached is a revised draft of the document I sent to you all earlier this morning. Given Marcus's well-placed concern that this letter would probably not be privileged from discovery in this or other related matters, I (a) beefed up the confidentiality provisions and (b) eliminated references to the reasons that we are including a confidentiality provision. I also mentioned that Enron would be billed directly by Scottsboro's outside counsel in this matter, which I know was a specific concern of Dean Varnek, Scottsboro's attorney. Please let me have your other comments/authority at your earliest convenience. Britt ----- Forwarded by Britt Davis/Corp/Enron on 12/13/2000 11:20 AM ----- Britt Davis 12/13/2000 09:54 AM To: Martin Stanley/EU/Enron@Enron, Nicole Dion/NA/Enron@Enron, Marcus Nettelton/NA/Enron@ENRON cc: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Becky Zikes/Corp/Enron@ENRON Subject: In re ICTS/Alabama v. Scottsboro Attached for your immediate review and approval is a proposed letter from Enron (please make sure I correctly identified the right Enron entity) agreeing to idemnify and defend Scottsboro in this matter. I told Scottsboro's attorney yesterday that this would be coming once we confirmed that all the loads for which Scottsboro is being sued are our loads. Nicole tells me that this is in fact the case. I would like to send out this letter ASAP today, to give us time to make arrangements with Scottsboro's usual attorneys, who then will be asked to get an extension of time for Scottsboro to answer from the trucker's counsel. I await your advice (Richard, per your instructions today, I will assume that you have no problem with this letter). Britt
|