![]() |
Enron Mail |
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Richard B Sanders X-To: Gail Brownfeld X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Richard_Sanders_Oct2001\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: Sanders-R X-FileName: rsanders.nsf Don't forget to call. My curiosity level is high. 713-853-5587 Gail Brownfeld/ENRON@enronXgate 03/07/2001 03:50 PM To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: RE: IHI Arbitration: PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY CLIENT COMMUNICATION I'll call you in a little bit. We'll be finishing up in about 45 minutes. Let's just say, Greg is earning his fee. -----Original Message----- From: Sanders, Richard Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 3:47 PM To: Brownfeld, Gail Subject: RE: IHI Arbitration: PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY CLIENT COMMUNICATION That all depends on your definition of the word"job." It was actually anticlimactic---Mark told Bob he needed to stick around on some of the old EI litigation, a fact we already knew. Are you at the Sempra deposition. how is it going? Gail Brownfeld/ENRON@enronXgate 03/07/2001 03:06 PM To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: RE: IHI Arbitration: PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY CLIENT COMMUNICATION He keeps saying that he "needs" the $15 million. Maybe it's a budget thing. I think he really just wants to renegotiate the deal. I don't think he thinks that IHI has the money to pay us back. What happened at the meeting on Monday with Mark? Do I still have a job? -----Original Message----- From: Sanders, Richard Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 3:02 PM To: Brownfeld, Gail Subject: RE: IHI Arbitration: PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY CLIENT COMMUNICATION Thanks. I have no idea why Enerson is being so panicky.
|