|
|
Enron Mail |
Unless their is a reason having to do with the case( ie we can somehow
recover our attys fees} I see no reason why we should separate the bills.Send me one bill. SHoward@milbank.com 07/13/2000 07:55 PM To: Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com cc: Subject: Farallon/Legg-Mason Bills Allocation Richard: Spending a block of time on Busse's deposition this week focuses me on a question that we have never really discussed:? How would you like Milbank to? allocate its time between the Farallon and Legg-Mason cases? To date, without really discussing it with you, we have (1) billed the Farallon and Legg-Mason cases separately and (2) allocated our time specifically relating to each case to that case but allocated "common" time entirely to the Farallon case. Is this what you want? Should we just send one bill for the two cases together? If we continue separate bills, what should be the allocation principle?? Should common time be allocated all to Farallon (the current practice)?? divided 50/50 between the two cases?? divided 18/5 between the two cases (i.e., allocated by the respective amounts in issue in the two cases) ? Any thoughts? Steve This e-mail message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail message from your computer.
|