Re: Grynberg II/TW v. El Paso

This letter could have negative ramifications. However, we should send it if
El Paso mismeasured the gas. What happened to the conference call?

Britt Davis@ENRON
07/31/2000 05:13 PM

To: ctetrault@velaw.com, Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Linda R
Guinn/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louis Soldano/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Becky
Zikes/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Grynberg II/TW v. El Paso

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, ATTORNEY WORK
PRODUCT, JOINT DEFENSE PRIVILEGE

Charlie and Richard, here is the draft letter to El Paso that I'd like to
run by you re possible Grynberg II ramifications. It is not yet final, but
you get the drift. By copy of this e-mail, I'm asking that Deborah, my
secretary, set up a conference room for me, Richard and Lou to meet in
tomorrow to discuss the letter; I'll patch Charlie in by telephone.

B.K.D.