Enron Mail

From:richard.sanders@enron.com
To:iblanco@bracepatt.com
Subject:Re: McKenna arbitration
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Tue, 13 Feb 2001 06:21:00 -0800 (PST)

Yes. What is your thinking on why they think it will only take one day?
Also-- who is the nuetral?



"Ileana Blanco" <iblanco@bracepatt.com<
02/13/2001 02:11 PM

To: <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com<
cc:
Subject: Re: McKenna arbitration


I thought he was just on Berry; you want him to get stuff on McKenna also?

<<< <Richard.B.Sanders@enron.com< 02/13/01 11:23AM <<<

Make sure you send these messages to Andy Edison



"Ileana
Blanco" To: <bonnie.white@enron.com<
<iblanco@brac cc: "J. Clifford Gunter"
<cgunter@bracepatt.com<,
epatt.com< <RSander@ECT.Enron.Com<,
<tmcdade@mfml.com<
Subject: McKenna arbitration
02/13/2001
10:46 AM






Richard Bianchi has proposed August 20 for the arbitration, which he
believes will not last more than a day.. Does that work for you and our
possible witnesses,if any? Short of the offtakers, which Max is concerned
about involving, who would you have in mind--since we are posturing this
as an msj case? If the date works, I would suggest that we try to depose
McKenna as soon as possible to see if there is any additional discovery we
really need. Let me hear from you'all and then I'll ask Tom to contact the
other arbitrators about their availability and the preparation of some kind
of scheduling order for discovery, motions, etc. deadlines.