|
|
Enron Mail |
Can we talk about this if it is still an active "case"
Christian Yoder 11/11/99 03:45 PM To: Tim Belden/HOU/ECT@ECT, Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Sean Crandall/PDX/ECT@ECT, Diana Scholtes/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Mid-C control area abuse Sean and I talked through the Mid-C control area abuse (Puget and WWP's refusal to honor Mid-C sales not sunk at Mid-C) with Dan Watkiss of Bracewell Patterson. After "sinking" his mind into the facts, Dan was of the view that a two pronged legal approach could be taken: 1. take one of our apparently frequent direct purchases from Puget at Mid-C as a test case and when Puget refuses to honor the schedule which requires it to be sunk at COB, sue them in a state court, and 2. bring a complaint against Puget at Ferc allegding conduct in breach of the Federal Power Act. There is enough wrong about this situation to cause Dan to say that both actions were potentially available. The real issue now is, do we want to disrupt our business relationship with Puget and WWP by taking either or both of these actions? Let's discuss this, and Richard, I apologize for not getting to you with this already, but will call you and discuss it right away.----cgy
|