![]() |
Enron Mail |
By copy of this e-mail, I am asking Twanda to set up a short conf.call w/yo= u on Wed or Thurs to discuss these issues -----Original Message----- From: =09"Robert Nelson" <JRNELSON@LLGM.COM<@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Ro= bert+20Nelson+22+20+3CJRNELSON+40LLGM+2ECOM+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]=20 Sent:=09Monday, September 17, 2001 7:13 PM To:=09Sanders, Richard B. Cc:=09Ceklund@llgm.com Subject:=09PX Committee call In today's call we addressed the usual issues. This Friday the complex lit= igation panel will decide whether to consolidate the commandeering suits. = In case you hadn't noticed, the state filed a declaratory relief action in = Sacramento naming each of the individual participants but not the PX. The = state's alleged fear is that it might be exposed to double recovery to the = PX and the individual participants, so it asks for a declaration of its exp= osure to the participants. The new complaint has not yet been served. Our= counsel who are trying to keep matters simple are considering strategies t= hat will avoid the need for each participant to respond, and we should have= some recommendation next week. Next, Howard Weg will circulate a draft mo= tion to FERC submitting his proposed settlement. We should have the draft = within the next week. Next, a subcommittee met with PG&E reps last week to= get a preview of a possible reorganization plan. Weg may call Michael Tri= bolet to get his take on plan structure. Next, the state Senate evidently = balked at the Edison bailout. Reliant and Marant have not filed a petition= and are considering their options in view of the possibility that the gove= rnor will call the legislature back into special session in early October. = In the meantime, Edison is producing documents in response to the 2004 not= ice. Weg raised a question about whether Enron will be filing an administr= ative claim in the PG&E case pursuant to court order in that case. I wasn'= t aware of the issue. Are you? There were productive plan discussions wit= h PX representatives as to structure and tasks of the PX going forward, and= we are expecting a proposal momentarily. Discussions with the Trade Credi= tors Committee still haven't reached closure. PX reps evidently will be ap= proaching PG&E and Edison to share the cost of future operations. Our next= committee call is Sept. 26 at 2. We still need to talk about the funding = issue when you have a moment. Bob "This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confident= ial and it may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges. Th= is e-mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intend= ed to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not an i= ntended recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and no= tify me by return mail, e-mail or at (insert your telephone number). The u= nauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this e-mail= , including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful. J. Robert Nelson 725 Soth Figueroa St, Los Angeles, Ca. 90017-5436 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D This e-mail, including attachments, contains information that is confidenti= al and may be protected by the attorney/client or other privileges. This e= -mail, including attachments, constitutes non-public information intended t= o be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not an inten= ded recipient, please delete this e-mail, including attachments, and notify= me. The unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of = this e-mail, including attachments, is prohibited and may be unlawful. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D
|