Enron Mail

From:david.roensch@enron.com
To:darrell.schoolcraft@enron.com
Subject:RE: TW Capacity Affected for Red Rock Tie-ins
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Wed, 14 Nov 2001 12:21:18 -0800 (PST)

Is this what you were asking me for???
---------------------- Forwarded by David Roensch/ET&S/Enron on 11/14/2001 =
01:21 PM ---------------------------
From:=09Byron Rance/ENRON@enronXgate on 07/19/2001 10:40 PM CDT
To:=09Eric Faucheaux/ENRON@enronXgate
cc:=09Arnold L Eisenstein/ENRON@enronXgate, Earl Chanley/ENRON@enronXgate, =
Rich Jolly/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, David Roensch/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ben Asante/ENR=
ON@enronXgate, Steve Crabtree/ENRON@enronXgate=20

Subject:=09RE: TW Capacity Affected for Red Rock Tie-ins

After discussion with Arnold Eisenstein, the following are (very) tentative=
dates for tie ins.
=20
Station 2, mainline, October 22, 2001, 4 days
Station 2, loop, November 5. 2 days
=20
Station 1, mainline, March 4, 2002, 4 days
Station 1, loop, March 13, 2002, 2 days
=20
Station 2, mainline, March 18, 2002, 4 days
Station 2, loop, March 28, 2002, 2 days.

-----Original Message-----=20
From: Faucheaux, Eric=20
Sent: Thu 7/19/2001 4:53 PM=20
To: Centilli, James; Watson, Kimberly; Lindberg, Lorraine=20
Cc: Rance, Byron; Eisenstein, Arnold L.; Gottsponer, Morgan; Asante, Ben; S=
choolcraft, Darrell; Graves, Jerry; Jolly, Rich; Chanley, Earl=20
Subject: TW Capacity Affected for Red Rock Tie-ins=20



The following volumes are capacities west of Station 1 that will result fro=
m tie-in construction work slated for the Red Rock expansion. Tie-in assem=
blies will be required on both the Mainline and Loopline at stations 1, 2, =
and 3. New block and side valve assemblies for new compressor and scrubber=
s will be installed on the suction side main and loop lines at each station=
. The tie-in will entail blocking (isolating) a line segment within the st=
ation yard on the suction side (each line done separately) thus creating a =
dead leg back to the next upstream block valve crossover(s). Hence, all of=
the flow will be forced into a single line when making tie-in on the adjac=
ent pipeline line. The result of forcing all volumes into a single line wi=
ll produce greater pressure losses in the operating segment to the existing=
compression and reduce throughput due to lower suction pressure and respec=
tive horsepower limitations. Discharge piping at the station having tie-in=
work will be unchanged regarding valving configurations.

Tie-in Schedule/Duration Capacity X-over Status

CS 2 ML Oct '01 / 4 days 960 MMcfd MLV 3010-open us/ds x-over;=
open us 30" x-over

CS 2 LL Oct '01 / 2 days 960 MMcfd MLV 3010-open us/ds=
x-over, open us 30" x-over

CS 1 ML Mar '02 / 4 days 990 MMcfd MLV 2012 & 2011-open us/ds =
x-over; open us 30" x-over

CS 1 LL Mar '02 / 2 days 990 MMcfd MLV 2012 & 2011-open us/ds =
x-over; open us 30" x-over

CS 3 ML Apr '02 / 4 days 1010 MMcfd MLV 4012 & 4011-open us/ds =
x-over; open us 30" x-over

CS 3 LL Apr '02 / 2 days 1010 MMcfd MLV 4012 & 4011-open us/ds =
x-over; open us 30"x-over

Notes:

1. Specific schedule dates are forthcoming=20
2. Schedules could be impacted by material deliveries and is based upo=
n receipt of construction permits=20
3. Durations consider working around the clock until completed=20