![]() |
Enron Mail |
Troy / Jim:
The following are issues or concerns that I think need to be addressed. If its OK I will pass these on as the pop into my head. 1) The 2001 Ad Valorem Tax should be allocated at closing based on the period of time each entity owns the facilities. This is important since the 2001 tax owed should be significantly higher (2 to 3 times the 2000 value) given the higher pricing. 2) Houston PipeLine has an Agricultural Exemption on the land out at Bammel on the Ad Valorem Tax. I believe this Exemption has to be renewed every two years. I would think that Enron would want to retain responsibility for renewing this exemption. Both parties have a vested interest since it will impact AEP's tax liability over the next 30 years but Enron wants the facility back with the exemption intact. 3) Houston PipeLine also has an agreement with the state of Texas regarding Production Tax. HPL only pays Production Tax on 7.5% of the withdrawal volumes. I do not think this will be impacted by the sale but it might be worth a quick review by the lawyer's. Ted Ryan can discuss the Ad Valorem Tax issues with you and the last person I talked to about the Production Tax issue was Dan Hyvl. Hope this is what you are looking for in this process. Jim Schwieger
|