|
|
Enron Mail |
---------------------- Forwarded by Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT on 03/22/2001 02:29
PM --------------------------- Jim Schwieger 04/04/2000 03:20 PM To: Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Brad Blevins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nathan L Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: RE: Second Interconnect between MidCon Texas and HPL I have not seen the email from Kevin. Would someone please send me a copy so that I can call him to discuss. Thanks, Swig ---------------------- Forwarded by Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2000 03:18 PM --------------------------- Gerald Nemec 04/04/2000 03:12 PM To: Brad Blevins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nathan L Hlavaty/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: RE: Second Interconnect between MidCon Texas and HPL I will revise the documents to reflect Flagstaff and the items we discussed at the meeting previously. Kevin's email indicates he wants to remove the language concerning a party obligations to refund the costs of the interconnect paid for by that party, if the other party is unable to maintain their pressure obligations. Does this need to stay or be removed? If this needs to stay, should someone tell Kevin that it will remain in the agreement ? ---------------------- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 04/04/2000 03:07 PM --------------------------- Jim Schwieger 04/03/2000 05:00 PM To: Brad Blevins/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick Cocavessis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve HPL Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Fiona Ryan/LON/ECT@ECT, John Towles/OTS/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: RE: Second Interconnect between MidCon Texas and HPL Sounds good to me! Let's get it done! Thanks, Swig ---------------------- Forwarded by Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2000 04:58 PM --------------------------- Enron North America Corp. From: Brad Blevins 04/03/2000 03:58 PM To: Jim Schwieger/HOU/ECT@ECT, Nick Cocavessis/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steve -HPL- Schneider/HOU/ECT@ECT, Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tom Fry/GCO/Enron@Enron, John Towles/OTS/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: RE: Second Interconnect between MidCon Texas and HPL MidCon has decided to move forward with Flagstaff. We have until November to complete this project. I suggest that we begin condemnation proceedings now against the landowners of the property that we need. We have been in unfruitful discussions with this family up until now. We need to get the ROW for this project moving so Tom can prepare a new cost estimate for the facilities. ---------------------- Forwarded by Brad Blevins/HOU/ECT on 04/03/2000 03:53 PM --------------------------- "Pilkington, Kevin" <Kevin_Pilkington@kne.com< on 03/30/2000 03:22:02 PM To: "'Brad Blevins'" <Brad.Blevins@enron.com< cc: Subject: RE: Second Interconnect between MidCon Texas and HPL We want to leave it at Flagstaff. Also, lets remove the penalty language in the Facility Agreements. Since we are both paying for our own facilities, I don't think it is needed. -----Original Message----- From: Brad Blevins [mailto:Brad.Blevins@enron.com] Sent: Monday, March 27, 2000 3:20 PM To: Pilkington, Kevin Subject: Second Interconnect between MidCon Texas and HPL Have you reached an agreement within your shop about the location of the second interconnect between the two companies?
|