![]() |
Enron Mail |
The attached letter agreement reflects my discussion with Drew about the
marketing fee. The FTS-1 Agreement will just be a plain vanilla agreement (i.e., minus the marketing fee language) and the parties will execute the attached instead. Questions or comments -- let me know. From: Mary Kay Miller 08/29/2000 06:19 PM To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Drew Fossum@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass, Mary Darveaux Subject: Re: Oneok Contract I've talked to Drew and he can report back- MK From: Susan Scott 08/29/2000 05:27 PM To: Drew Fossum@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Michelle Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: Oneok Contract Attached is the proposed contract with Oneok. Since it is a maximum rate deal, there is no discount letter. However, I am circulating this for approval because it contains a special provision (found in the "Other" section) regarding marketing of capacity for release, as allowed by Section 30.8 of the General Terms and Conditions of Transwestern's tariff. Christine, you and Michele will need to fill in the address and account information. My sincerest apologies for operating outside the usual contracting procedure but since time is even more of the essence that usual here, I felt it was best to get a pro forma version of this out for approval as soon as possible. Please e-mail your approval to Christine and me by noon tomorrow if possible. Thank you.
|