|
|
Enron Mail |
This would be analogous to every time you send me an e-mail, I forward it
directly to Drew and Maria. How do you tactfully advise your coworkers about corporate etiquette? I wonder. On a substantive note, I sincerely believe the analysis MKM wants is beyond the scope of this letter, and would have no qualms about sending it. Jeffery Fawcett 11/22/2000 08:22 AM To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Proposal to Caithness Big Sandy Now do you see why I didn't want to send this to Keith Petersen??? Anytime you send anything to Omaha, the MKM cult goes into their Satan worship chamber, they sing a few chants, and then sacrifice the good commercial effort to the demon regulatory god. Jeez, next time I'm gonna just send it out to the customer and ask for forgiveness later. ---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron on 11/22/2000 08:10 AM --------------------------- From: Mary Kay Miller 11/22/2000 08:07 AM To: Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, James Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: Proposal to Caithness Big Sandy Jeff, do you have the information for the rate? We would have to file a certificate and the rate would need to be calculated in accordance with the standard COS methodology- I want to make sure that the rate you are planning to quote matches what the rate derivation for the filing would be- avoid a potential issue- maybe James could send us what he did- thanks MK Keith Petersen 11/21/2000 04:56 PM To: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michele Winckowski/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Proposal to Caithness Big Sandy I have not yet reviewed, this is for your information. Keith ---------------------- Forwarded by Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron on 11/21/2000 04:53 PM --------------------------- Jeffery Fawcett 11/21/2000 01:17 PM To: Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron cc: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Keith Petersen/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ronald Matthews/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Rod Hayslett/FGT/Enron@ENRON, James Centilli/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: Proposal to Caithness Big Sandy Attached for your review and comment is a broad outline of a rate proposal to Caithness for the construction and operation of the 40-mile lateral to the Big Sandy project. This non-binding proposal was requested by Caithness' consultant, George Briden, as a starting point for modeling the economics of the project's gas supply and a basis for further discussions aimed at designing an appropriate deal structure. For your information, James Centilli calculated the transport rate based on the (+/- 30%) $20.33MM cost estimate with a ten-year (contract) amortization. I plan to put this in the mail by the close of business tomorrow. If you have any suggestions, please let me hear from you by mid-day. Thanks.
|