Re: Proposed revisions to CSA Letter

You'll see that point in WHP's own comments as well, so we recommend it stay
in as well.

John

BETA Consulting
Burkee@cts.com
(760) 723-1831 Voice
(760) 723-1891 FAX
----- Original Message -----
From: Tom Beach <tomb@crossborderenergy.com<
To: <Michael.Alexander@sce.com<; Michael Rochman <rochmanm@spurr.org<
Cc: 'Skaff, Andy@Dynegy' <askaff@chrm.com<; 'Dingwall, Brian@UEM'
<bdingwall@unitedgas.com<; 'John Burkholder' <burkee@cts.com<; 'Jun,
Christine@aelaw' <chj@aelaw.com<; 'Rick Counihan, Greenmountain.com'
<counihan@greenmountain.com<; 'Craig Chancellor' <craigc@calpine.com<;
'Bayless, David@Utility' <david.bayless@utility.com<; 'Elsesser,
Evelyn@aelaw' <eke@aelaw.com<; 'Worster, Gerard@TXU'
<gworster@txuenergy.com<; 'Jeff Dasovich' <jdasovic@enron.com<;
<Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com<; 'Jeff Fawcett, Transwestern'
<jfawcett@enron.com<; <jleslie@LUCE.com<; 'Paul, Joe@Dynegy'
<joe.paul%dynegy@sce.com<; 'Johnson, Pamela@REMAC'
<johnson_pamela@lacoe.edu<; 'Karp, Joseph@Whitecase'
<karpjos@sf.whitecase.com<; 'McCrea, Keith@CIG/CM' <kmccrea@sablaw.com<;
<kmills@CFBF.com<; 'How-Downing, Lindsey' <Lindseyhowdowning@dwt.com<; 'MBD'
<MDay@GMSSR.com<; 'Paul Amirault' <PaulAmirault@aec.ca<; 'Phil
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: Proposed revisions to CSA Letter

< I support putting back some more about how we have been jerked around
< prcedurally.
<
<
< ----- Original Message -----
< From: <Michael.Alexander@sce.com<
< To: Michael Rochman <rochmanm@spurr.org<
< Cc: 'Mike Alexander' <alexanms@sce.com<; 'Skaff, Andy@Dynegy'
< <askaff@chrm.com<; 'Dingwall, Brian@UEM' <bdingwall@unitedgas.com<; 'John
< Burkholder' <burkee@cts.com<; 'Jun, Christine@aelaw' <chj@aelaw.com<;
'Rick
< Counihan, Greenmountain.com' <counihan@greenmountain.com<; 'Craig
< Chancellor' <craigc@calpine.com<; 'Bayless, David@Utility'
< <david.bayless@utility.com<; 'Elsesser, Evelyn@aelaw' <eke@aelaw.com<;
< 'Worster, Gerard@TXU' <gworster@txuenergy.com<; 'Jeff Dasovich'
< <jdasovic@enron.com<; <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com<; 'Jeff Fawcett,
< Transwestern' <jfawcett@enron.com<; <jleslie@LUCE.com<; 'Paul, Joe@Dynegy'
< <joe.paul%dynegy@sce.com<; 'Johnson, Pamela@REMAC'
< <johnson_pamela@lacoe.edu<; 'Karp, Joseph@Whitecase'
< <karpjos@sf.whitecase.com<; 'McCrea, Keith@CIG/CM' <kmccrea@sablaw.com<;
< <kmills@CFBF.com<; 'How-Downing, Lindsey' <Lindseyhowdowning@dwt.com<;
'MBD'
< <MDay@GMSSR.com<; 'Paul A
< Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 11:13 AM
< Subject: RE: Proposed revisions to CSA Letter
<
<
< <
< < Mike,
< <
< < Edison can deal with the letter, either in it's pre-SoCalGas modified
< form,
< < or with the SoCalGas edited letter. Unless you hear otherwise from us,
< < consider us signatories (using Doug Porter's name).
< <
< < However, I do agree with Michael Rochman that the SoCalGas version's
< < comments on point five are a bit weaker than I would like. It is more
< than
< < a matter of having to duplicate the effort already expended, it is also
a
< < matter of having to justify that level of effort in light of a
diminished
< < perception (at least) of the chances of implementation of the results of
< < that effort. I would prefer that be indicated politely, but clearly.
< <
< <
< < --
< < Michael S. Alexander
< < Southern California Edison
< < 626-302-2029
< < 626-302-3254 (fax)
< <
< <
< <
< <
< < Michael
< < Rochman To: "'MBD'"
<MDay@GMSSR.com<,
< "'Pocta, Robert
< < <rochmanm@spu M.'" <rmp@cpuc.ca.gov<,
< "'Counihan, Rick'"
< < rr.org<
< <rick.counihan@greenmountain.com<,
< < "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'"
< < 12/11/2000 <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com<,
"'John
< Burkholder'"
< < 10:57 AM <burkee@cts.com<, "'Mike
< Alexander'"
< < <alexanms@sce.com<, "'Craig
< Chancellor'"
< < <craigc@calpine.com<, "'Colin
< Cushnie'"
< < <cushnice@sce.com<, "'Jeff
< Dasovich'"
< < <jdasovic@enron.com<, "'Paul
< Amirault'"
< < <PaulAmirault@aec.ca<, "'Doug
< Porter'"
< < <porterdk@sce.com<, "'Tom
Beach'"
< < <tomb@crossborderenergy.com<,
< "'Amirault, Paul'"
< < <PaulAmirault@aec.ca<, "'Craig
< Chancellor,
< < Calpine'" <craigc@calpine.com<,
< "'How-Downing,
< < Lindsey'"
< <Lindseyhowdowning@dwt.com<, "'Phil
< < Davies, WGSI Calgary'"
< <PhilDavies@aec.ca<,
< < "'jleslie@LUCE.com'"
< <jleslie@LUCE.com<, "'Jeff
< < Fawcett, Transwestern'"
< <jfawcett@enron.com<,
< < Michael Rochman
< <rochmanm@spurr.org<, "'Rick
< < Counihan, Greenmountain.com'"
< < <counihan@greenmountain.com<,
< "'Bayless,
< < David@Utility'"
< <david.bayless@utility.com<,
< < "'Dingwall, Brian@UEM'"
< <bdingwall@unitedgas.com<,
< < "'Elsesser, Evelyn@aelaw'"
< <eke@aelaw.com<,
< < "'Johnson, Pamela@REMAC'"
< < <johnson_pamela@lacoe.edu<,
< "'Jun,
< < Christine@aelaw'"
< <chj@aelaw.com<, "'Karp,
< < Joseph@Whitecase'"
< <karpjos@sf.whitecase.com<,
< < "'McCrea, Keith@CIG/CM'"
< <kmccrea@sablaw.com<,
< < "'Paul, Joe@Dynegy'"
< <joe.paul@dynegy<, "'Pocta,
< < Mark@ORA'" <rmp@cpuc.ca.gov<,
< "'Scott, Susan@TW'"
< < <sscott3@enron.com<, "'Worster,
< Gerard@TXU'"
< < <gworster@txuenergy.com<,
< "'kmills@CFBF.com'"
< < <kmills@CFBF.com<, "'Karp,
< Joseph@Whitecase'"
< < <karpjos@sf.whitecase.com<,
< "'Skaff, Andy@Dynegy'"
< < <askaff@chrm.com<
< < cc:
< < Subject: RE: Proposed
< revisions to CSA Letter
< <
< <
< <
< <
< <
< < I would like to see us try to re-insert words to the effect that if the
< < Commission throws out the CSA after haranguing the parties to reach an
< < agreement, it will seriously discourage future settlement efforts by
< < parties. That is not a deal-breaker for me, just a suggestion. Otherwise
< < the comments are fine.
< <
< <
< < -----Original Message-----
< < From: MBD [mailto:MDay@GMSSR.com]
< < Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 10:43 AM
< < To: 'Pocta, Robert M.'; 'Counihan, Rick'; 'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com';
< < 'John Burkholder'; 'Mike Alexander'; 'Craig Chancellor'; 'Colin
< < Cushnie'; 'Jeff Dasovich'; MBD; 'Paul Amirault'; 'Doug Porter'; 'Tom
< < Beach'; 'Amirault, Paul'; 'Craig Chancellor, Calpine'; 'How-Downing,
< < Lindsey'; 'Phil Davies, WGSI Calgary'; 'jleslie@LUCE.com'; 'Jeff
< < Fawcett, Transwestern'; 'Michael Rochman'; 'Rick Counihan,
< < Greenmountain.com'; 'Bayless, David@Utility'; 'Dingwall, Brian@UEM';
< < 'Elsesser, Evelyn@aelaw'; 'Johnson, Pamela@REMAC'; 'Jun,
< < Christine@aelaw'; 'Karp, Joseph@Whitecase'; 'McCrea, Keith@CIG/CM';
< < 'Paul, Joe@Dynegy'; 'Pocta, Mark@ORA'; 'Scott, Susan@TW'; 'Worster,
< < Gerard@TXU'; 'kmills@CFBF.com'; 'Karp, Joseph@Whitecase'; 'Skaff,
< < Andy@Dynegy'
< < Subject: FW: Proposed revisions to CSA Letter
< <
< <
< <
< <
< <
< < Here are some edits to our letter from socal. I do not feel they
diminsh
< < the usefulness of the letter, and they moderate the tone a little, as
you
< < would expect. They also eliminate the lengthy recitation of the
< procedural
< <
< < events at the end of the letter. If this gets them on the letter, I say
< < let's sign. I will assume everyone who signed on last week stays on the
< < letter unless I hear differently from you by 3 pm today. I really
< < appreciate the quick turnaround. Mike Day
< <
< <
< < -----Original Message-----
< < From: Wright, Gillian - TP1GXW [mailto:GWright@sempra.com]
< < Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 10:26 AM
< < To: 'mday@gmssr.com'
< < Subject: Proposed revisions to CSA Letter
< <
< <
< <
< <
< <
< <
< < Mike,
< < Here are SoCal's proposed revisions to the CSA letter - I'll call in a
< < minute. The edits are pretty extensive, but all along the lines we
< < discussed (ie changing the tone to a more positive one).
< <
< <
< < Gillian
< <
< <
< < <<CSA Letter SCG.doc<<
< <
< <
< < Gillian A. Wright
< < Regulatory Case Manager
< < Sempra Energy
< < 555 W. Fifth St. GT14D6
< < Los Angeles, CA 90013-1011
< < (213) 244-3833
< < (213) 244-8820 fax
< < gwright@sempra.com
< <
< <
< <
< <
< <
< <
< <
< <
< <
< <
<
<