|
|
Enron Mail |
After our IOS adventure last week, I put together the following questions=
=20 that need to be resolved. Some of them have needed to be resolved for quit= e=20 some time. Tony, let's talk since I think some of these have already been= =20 discussed and maybe resolved in the context of developing TW's EnronOnline= =20 site, and I just need to get up to speed. To the extent there aren't answe= rs=20 yet, I'll get busy researching. Drew -- comments? Shall we all get on the= =20 phone & discuss this? List of TW contracting issues 1. Reevaluate the following in the context of current FERC negotiated rate= =20 policy: a. Transwestern's current form discount letter states: "[t]he total char= ge=20 shall include all applicable surcharges." Should this language be revised= ,=20 and if so, how? b. Transwestern usually charges one-part rates, and includes language in= =20 its discount letter stating that Transwestern shall allocate the combined= =20 rate between the reservation and commodity components inclusive of=20 surcharges. Are one-part rates really negotiated rates? material deviatio= ns=20 from the tariff?=20 c. Transwestern's discount letter includes a statement that in no event= =20 shall the contract rate be greater than the maximum or lower than the minim= um=20 rates provided in Transwestern=01,s tariff. This was intended as assurance= that=20 the contract is not a negotiated rate. Is this language still effective? = =20 necessary? 2. IOS/EnronOnline: a. When should IOS be conducted, if at all? b. Once notice of IOS or EnronOnline bidding has been posted, can the=20 subject capacity still be sold off-line (i.e., pursuant to traditional=20 bidding procedures)? c. Is our system for IOS and EnronOnline set up to handle max rate biddin= g=20 situations in a nondiscriminatory manner and in compliance with the bid=20 evaluation procedures in the tariff? If not, what changes need to be made?
|