index of customers

Frazier and Dari: Elizabeth Brown and Rita Bianchi have asked whether we
need to include our so-called "pool" contracts on TW's index of customers.
These are FTS-1 agreements which have a reservation charge of $0 for transfer
from a pool to a point within the pool (involving no actual movement of
gas). Historically TW has categorized such agreements as "administrative"
and has not included them on the index of customers. Apparently we need the
contracts to exist as FTS-1 agreements for internal purposes.

I suppose the question has come up again in Elizabeth's and Rita's review of
our postings for Order 637 purposes: whether the two "pool" contracts (Amoco
and Burlington) need to be included on the Index of Customers. I suppose
that technically they should be since they are called FTS-1 agreements.
However, I have very little heartburn with continuing to leave them off the
list since no transportation is ever involved.

My main concern is that we be consistent among the pipelines, in order to
simplify the maintenance of our websites. Please let me know what you think,