Enron Mail

From: alb@cpuc.ca.gov To: alan_reid@pcp.ca, alb@cpuc.ca.gov, andy.bettwy@swgas.com, aod@newsdata.com,askaff@energy-law-group.com, bcragg@gmssr.com, bho@cpuc.ca.gov, bjeider@ci.burbank.ca.us, burkee@cts.com, bwood@energy.state.ca.us, ceyap@earthlink.net, chilen@llgm.com, chris. Subject: Prepared Testimony in I 99-07-003 Cc: Bcc: Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 06:43:00 -0700 (PDT) It has been brought to my attention that the April 12, 2000 ruling re testimony says, in Ordering Paragraph 4, that testimony shall be FILED on May 5.? This word was inadvertently employed.? Testimony should be served on the service list and lodged with me.? It should not go to the Docket office.? Testimony will become part of the record after motions to strike are ruled upon and witnesses have adopted their testimony at the hearing. I am sorry for the confusion caused by the incorrect choice of words.