|
|
Enron Mail |
Let me clarify two of the more substantive matters that were not included in
the errata - Wheeler Ridge and the Pooling Revisions.? The first, Wheeler Ridge, was not included in the errata because of concerns expressed by IP and ORA about the impact these changes would have on Kern River shippers.? SoCalGas did not oppose the revision and would accept the language as proposed by PG&E, especially if it would gain their non-opposition.? There was also a concern expressed by some parties that the WR revisions went beyond the bounds of an errata and should be considered a revision of the settlement.?? As for the Pooling Revisions, Dynegy expressed reservations about the proposed changes that included substantial increases in the number of pools available per shipper.? Dynegy was not able to garner internal approval in time for us to prepare the errata for filing later today, so Pooling revisions were taken off the table.? SoCalGas supports the pooling revisions and no other party expressed any concerns.? ALJ Biren asked us to file a revised settlement document with the corrected pages included and to mail it out to the parties today, so our already compressed deadline for getting this out the door was even more compressed.? Since I was unable to get resolution from all of the parties of the outstanding differences, I could not include the revisions that were circulated (to our dismay).? PG&E has now indicated they will file limited opposition and they have now served a discovery request upon SoCalGas with regard to Wheeler Ridge. -----Original Message----- From: Craig Chancellor [mailto:craigc@calpine.com] Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 8:15 AM To: 'Cherry, Brian - TPBKC'; 'AlexanMS@sce.com'; 'paulamirault@aec.ca'; 'david.bayless@utility.com'; 'Tomb@crossborderenergy.com'; 'Burkee@cts.com'; Craig Chancellor; 'Rick.Counihan@greenmountain.com'; 'Jdasovic@enron.com'; 'Mday@gmssr.com'; 'bdingwall@unitedgas.com'; 'Douglass@arterhadden.com'; 'eke@aelaw.com'; 'Jfawcet@enron.com'; 'rfoss@coral-energy.com'; 'plg@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'johnj@bcjlaw.com'; 'Johnson_Pamela@lacoe.edu'; 'karpjos@sf.whitecase.com'; 'jleslie@luce.com'; 'kmccrea@sablaw.com'; 'jmpa@dynegy.com'; 'rmp@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'porterdk@sce.com'; 'RochmanM@cubjpa.org'; 'RochmanM@spurr.org'; 'susan.scott@enron.com'; Beamish, Richard - TPRMB; Betonte, Robert - TP2RSB; Brill, Thomas R.; Cotton, Gary; Davis, Robert E.; Davis, Steven D.; Fair, Pam; Follett, B. David - TPDBF; Fong, Ed; Freeman, Kimberly; Gaines, Mark - TPMFG; Harrigan, James P. - TP1JPH; Hay, James E.; Hubbard, Lisa J.; Lorenz, Lad - TPLPL; McVay, Nancy W - TPNWM; Morrow, Rick - TP3RMM; Purves, Ralph A.; Rawlings, Roy - TP4RMR; Reed, Debra L. - TP3DLR; Reed, William; Sakarias, Wayne P.; Schavrien, Lee; Smith, Anne S. - TPASS; Stewart, Lee M. - TP4LMS; Sullivan, Glen J.; Surak, Thomas M. - TP1TMS; Suwara, J.- TPJUS; Takemura, Earl - TPEKT; Teeter, James S.; Van Lierop, Jan - TP2JXV; Watson, Steven - TP2SAW; Wright, Gillian - TP1GXW; Barker, David - TPDTB; 'How-Downing, Lindsey'; 'Jun, Christine'; 'Gileau, Pat'; 'Khoury, Dexter' Cc: Sullivan, Glen J.; Watson, Steven - TP2SAW; Lorenz, Lad - TPLPL; Nelson, Eric B. - TPEBN Subject: RE: GIR Brian, I did not see a change on the Wheeler Ridge capacity issue that was put forth earlier.? Several parties supported the change including Calpine, SCE, WHP and WGS and no opposition was voiced.? It is my understanding that PG&E will not sign on to the Settlement even if this change is made but will agree not to oppose (this issue and many others).? Not only does the change itself make sense but there is a lot of value in not having another front to do battle on in the hearing process.? Is SoCalGas opposed to this change? And if so, why? Thanks Craig < -----Original Message----- < From: Cherry, Brian - TPBKC [SMTP:BCherry@sempra.com] < Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 7:46 AM < To:?? 'AlexanMS@sce.com'; 'paulamirault@aec.ca'; < 'david.bayless@utility.com'; 'Tomb@crossborderenergy.com'; < 'Burkee@cts.com'; 'Craigc@calpine.com'; 'Rick.Counihan@greenmountain.com'; < 'Jdasovic@enron.com'; 'Mday@gmssr.com'; 'bdingwall@unitedgas.com'; < 'Douglass@arterhadden.com'; 'eke@aelaw.com'; 'Jfawcet@enron.com'; < 'rfoss@coral-energy.com'; 'plg@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'johnj@bcjlaw.com'; < 'Johnson_Pamela@lacoe.edu'; 'karpjos@sf.whitecase.com'; < 'jleslie@luce.com'; 'kmccrea@sablaw.com'; 'jmpa@dynegy.com'; < 'rmp@cpuc.ca.gov'; 'porterdk@sce.com'; 'RochmanM@cubjpa.org'; < 'RochmanM@spurr.org'; 'susan.scott@enron.com'; Beamish, Richard - TPRMB; < Betonte, Robert - TP2RSB; Brill, Thomas R.; Cotton, Gary; Davis, Robert < E.; Davis, Steven D.; Fair, Pam; Follett, B. David - TPDBF; Fong, Ed; < Freeman, Kimberly; Gaines, Mark - TPMFG; Harrigan, James P. - TP1JPH; Hay, < James E.; Hubbard, Lisa J.; Lorenz, Lad - TPLPL; McVay, Nancy W - TPNWM; < Morrow, Rick - TP3RMM; Purves, Ralph A.; Rawlings, Roy - TP4RMR; Reed, < Debra L. - TP3DLR; Reed, William; Sakarias, Wayne P.; Schavrien, Lee; < Smith, Anne S. -? TPASS; Stewart, Lee M. - TP4LMS; Sullivan, Glen J.; < Surak, Thomas M. - TP1TMS; Suwara, J.- TPJUS; Takemura, Earl - TPEKT; < Teeter, James S.; Van Lierop, Jan - TP2JXV; Watson, Steven - TP2SAW; < Wright, Gillian - TP1GXW; Cherry, Brian - TPBKC; Barker, David - TPDTB; < 'How-Downing, Lindsey'; 'Jun, Christine'; 'Gileau, Pat'; 'Khoury, Dexter' < Cc:?? Cherry, Brian - TPBKC; Sullivan, Glen J.; Watson, Steven - TP2SAW; < Lorenz, Lad - TPLPL; Nelson, Eric B. - TPEBN < Subject:????? FW: GIR < < FYI.? The attached documents contain the errata we expect to file with the < Commission later today.? As you can see, the changes are not substantive. < < -----Original Message----- < From:?? Sullivan, Glen J. < Sent:?? Thursday, April 27, 2000 5:58 PM < To:???? Cherry, Brian - TPBKC < Subject:??????? GIR < < <<ld2d-#69954-1.DOC<< <<ld2d-#69955-1.DOC<< < < Here's the draft errata filing (plus adding 2 new parties) for tomorrow. < Can you circulate?? -- Glen <? << File: ld2d-#69954-1.DOC <<? << File: ld2d-#69955-1.DOC <<
|