![]() |
Enron Mail |
Mike,
The version of this that you sent out forgot the ".com" on Joe Paul's address. I forwarded a copy of it to him, but we want to correct it in future forwardings, etc. of this letter. -- Michael S. Alexander Southern California Edison 626-302-2029 626-302-3254 (fax) MBD <MDay@GMSSR.c To: "'Pocta, Robert M.'" <rmp@cpuc.ca.gov<, om< "'Counihan, Rick'" <rick.counihan@greenmountain.com<, 12/11/2000 "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'" 10:43 AM <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com<, "'John Burkholder'" <burkee@cts.com<, "'Mike Alexander'" <alexanms@sce.com<, "'Craig Chancellor'" <craigc@calpine.com<, "'Colin Cushnie'" <cushnice@sce.com<, "'Jeff Dasovich'" <jdasovic@enron.com<, MBD <MDay@GMSSR.com<, "'Paul Amirault'" <PaulAmirault@aec.ca<, "'Doug Porter'" <porterdk@sce.com<, "'Tom Beach'" <tomb@crossborderenergy.com<, "'Amirault, Paul'" <PaulAmirault@aec.ca<, "'Craig Chancellor, Calpine'" <craigc@calpine.com<, "'How-Downing, Lindsey'" <Lindseyhowdowning@dwt.com<, "'Phil Davies, WGSI Calgary'" <PhilDavies@aec.ca<, "'jleslie@LUCE.com'" <jleslie@LUCE.com<, "'Jeff Fawcett, Transwestern'" <jfawcett@enron.com<, "'Michael Rochman'" <rochmanm@spurr.org<, "'Rick Counihan, Greenmountain.com'" <counihan@greenmountain.com<, "'Bayless, David@Utility'" <david.bayless@utility.com<, "'Dingwall, Brian@UEM'" <bdingwall@unitedgas.com<, "'Elsesser, Evelyn@aelaw'" <eke@aelaw.com<, "'Johnson, Pamela@REMAC'" <johnson_pamela@lacoe.edu<, "'Jun, Christine@aelaw'" <chj@aelaw.com<, "'Karp, Joseph@Whitecase'" <karpjos@sf.whitecase.com<, "'McCrea, Keith@CIG/CM'" <kmccrea@sablaw.com<, "'Paul, Joe@Dynegy'" <joe.paul@dynegy<, "'Pocta, Mark@ORA'" <rmp@cpuc.ca.gov<, "'Scott, Susan@TW'" <sscott3@enron.com<, "'Worster, Gerard@TXU'" <gworster@txuenergy.com<, "'kmills@CFBF.com'" <kmills@CFBF.com<, "'Karp, Joseph@Whitecase'" <karpjos@sf.whitecase.com<, "'Skaff, Andy@Dynegy'" <askaff@chrm.com< cc: Subject: FW: Proposed revisions to CSA Letter Here are some edits to our letter from socal. I do not feel they diminsh the usefulness of the letter, and they moderate the tone a little, as you would expect. They also eliminate the lengthy recitation of the procedural events at the end of the letter. If this gets them on the letter, I say let's sign. I will assume everyone who signed on last week stays on the letter unless I hear differently from you by 3 pm today. I really appreciate the quick turnaround. Mike Day -----Original Message----- From: Wright, Gillian - TP1GXW [mailto:GWright@sempra.com] Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 10:26 AM To: 'mday@gmssr.com' Subject: Proposed revisions to CSA Letter Mike, Here are SoCal's proposed revisions to the CSA letter - I'll call in a minute. The edits are pretty extensive, but all along the lines we discussed (ie changing the tone to a more positive one). Gillian <<CSA Letter SCG.doc<< Gillian A. Wright Regulatory Case Manager Sempra Energy 555 W. Fifth St. GT14D6 Los Angeles, CA 90013-1011 (213) 244-3833 (213) 244-8820 fax gwright@sempra.com (See attached file: CSA Letter SCG.doc) - CSA Letter SCG.doc
|