Re: FW: Proposed revisions to CSA Letter

Mike,

The version of this that you sent out forgot the ".com" on Joe Paul's
address. I forwarded a copy of it to him, but we want to correct it in
future forwardings, etc. of this letter.
--
Michael S. Alexander
Southern California Edison
626-302-2029
626-302-3254 (fax)

MBD
<MDay@GMSSR.c To: "'Pocta, Robert M.'"
<rmp@cpuc.ca.gov<,
om< "'Counihan, Rick'"
<rick.counihan@greenmountain.com<,
12/11/2000 "'Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com'"
10:43 AM <Jeff.Dasovich@enron.com<, "'John
Burkholder'"
<burkee@cts.com<, "'Mike Alexander'"
<alexanms@sce.com<, "'Craig
Chancellor'"
<craigc@calpine.com<, "'Colin
Cushnie'"
<cushnice@sce.com<, "'Jeff Dasovich'"
<jdasovic@enron.com<, MBD
<MDay@GMSSR.com<, "'Paul
Amirault'" <PaulAmirault@aec.ca<,
"'Doug Porter'"
<porterdk@sce.com<, "'Tom Beach'"
<tomb@crossborderenergy.com<,
"'Amirault, Paul'"
<PaulAmirault@aec.ca<, "'Craig
Chancellor,
Calpine'" <craigc@calpine.com<,
"'How-Downing,
Lindsey'"
<Lindseyhowdowning@dwt.com<, "'Phil
Davies, WGSI Calgary'"
<PhilDavies@aec.ca<,
"'jleslie@LUCE.com'"
<jleslie@LUCE.com<, "'Jeff
Fawcett, Transwestern'"
<jfawcett@enron.com<,
"'Michael Rochman'"
<rochmanm@spurr.org<, "'Rick
Counihan, Greenmountain.com'"
<counihan@greenmountain.com<,
"'Bayless,
David@Utility'"
<david.bayless@utility.com<,
"'Dingwall, Brian@UEM'"
<bdingwall@unitedgas.com<,
"'Elsesser, Evelyn@aelaw'"
<eke@aelaw.com<,
"'Johnson, Pamela@REMAC'"
<johnson_pamela@lacoe.edu<, "'Jun,
Christine@aelaw'" <chj@aelaw.com<,
"'Karp,
Joseph@Whitecase'"
<karpjos@sf.whitecase.com<,
"'McCrea, Keith@CIG/CM'"
<kmccrea@sablaw.com<,
"'Paul, Joe@Dynegy'"
<joe.paul@dynegy<, "'Pocta,
Mark@ORA'" <rmp@cpuc.ca.gov<,
"'Scott, Susan@TW'"
<sscott3@enron.com<, "'Worster,
Gerard@TXU'"
<gworster@txuenergy.com<,
"'kmills@CFBF.com'"
<kmills@CFBF.com<, "'Karp,
Joseph@Whitecase'"
<karpjos@sf.whitecase.com<, "'Skaff,
Andy@Dynegy'"
<askaff@chrm.com<
cc:
Subject: FW: Proposed revisions
to CSA Letter

Here are some edits to our letter from socal. I do not feel they diminsh
the usefulness of the letter, and they moderate the tone a little, as you
would expect. They also eliminate the lengthy recitation of the procedural
events at the end of the letter. If this gets them on the letter, I say
let's sign. I will assume everyone who signed on last week stays on the
letter unless I hear differently from you by 3 pm today. I really
appreciate the quick turnaround. Mike Day

-----Original Message-----
From: Wright, Gillian - TP1GXW [mailto:GWright@sempra.com]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 10:26 AM
To: 'mday@gmssr.com'
Subject: Proposed revisions to CSA Letter

Mike,
Here are SoCal's proposed revisions to the CSA letter - I'll call in a
minute. The edits are pretty extensive, but all along the lines we
discussed (ie changing the tone to a more positive one).

Gillian

<<CSA Letter SCG.doc<<

Gillian A. Wright
Regulatory Case Manager
Sempra Energy
555 W. Fifth St. GT14D6
Los Angeles, CA 90013-1011
(213) 244-3833
(213) 244-8820 fax
gwright@sempra.com

(See attached file: CSA Letter SCG.doc)

- CSA Letter SCG.doc