|
|
Enron Mail |
I'm saving this message, by the way. Your characterization of Omaha may be
worth money someday. Jeffery Fawcett 06/28/2000 04:33 PM To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Capacity Options on TW You know how much I loathe these meetings with the Hee-Haw gang. This telecon/videocon will likely degrade into a raucous Omaha-led circle jerk with everyone else, mostly the Houston group, trying to get a word in edgewise. Is there any way to make this more fruitful? If we do this, and you want to include me, you'll have to put it together before close of business Friday as I'm out all next week for surgery. ---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron on 06/28/2000 04:26 PM --------------------------- From: Drew Fossum 06/28/2000 03:41 PM To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michele Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, sstojic@gbmdc.com Subject: Re: Capacity Options on TW Given the overwhelming response so far, I think a meeting may be necessary to get this project moving. Thanks. DF From: Susan Scott 06/28/2000 11:41 AM To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michele Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, sstojic@gbmdc.com cc: Subject: Capacity Options on TW So far I have not received comments from anyone on the attached. If you think it would be productive to get everyone together (possibly as early as Friday?) for about an hour to discuss capacity options, I will set up a meeting. Please let me know one way or the other. Thank you. ---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 06/28/2000 11:39 AM --------------------------- From: Susan Scott 06/21/2000 12:41 PM To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michele Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, sstojic@gbmdc.com cc: Subject: Capacity Options on TW Attached is a preliminary draft of a filing for capacity options on Transwestern. The attachments include a filing letter, proposed tariff language and a proposed form agreement. Obviously there are still quite a few details to be worked out. I am distributing a draft at this early stage in hopes of initiating a dialogue about the larger issues first. A few that come to mind are whether we want to commit to selling options online, how best to explain or justify the option fee, and what specifically in the industry has changed such that FERC should depart from existing policy and allow TW to essentially reserve future capacity for shippers. Please let me know your thoughts on these and any other issues. I would prefer to wait to discuss comments on wording, other conforming changes to the tariff, and other comments concerning form until after we have resolved the substantive issues. Thanks.
|