|
|
Enron Mail |
Our answer is simple: It is not our policy to release such information
unless we are required to do so by law, regulation or order. Jeffery Fawcett 03/29/2000 06:04 PM To: Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Nacey/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Ramona Betancourt/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: Estimate for Pooling Service on TW Lindy, I agree with Lynn -- not only for the valid reasons she articulated, but because I think we may have a conflict of interest here. You see, Transwestern is a formal party to the GIR proceeding. As such, we are currently involved (albeit indirectly) in negotiations with SoCal and other parties regarding the ability [and mechanism] for SoCal to recover costs to implement unbundled services on their system. System pooling is one of those services. I'll defer to counsel on this, but in my humble opinion, I don't think it wise for TW to offer SoCal any kind of cost figure to base its estimates on. First, its probably not good form for one party to the proceeding to give another party information that could prove to be prejudicial. Secondly, and probably more practically, if Transwestern were of a mind to, it could intentionally skew the results of their survey. Unless collective wisdom feels differently, I'd suggest we politely decline on some reasonably nebulous basis, i.e. --- we don't know... we forgot.... we really didn't account for it separately... it's been too long.... the people who might have known are no longer here... whatever. That way we don't appear uncooperative, just incompetent! I'm kidding. Just let me know how else I can help here. Lindy Donoho 03/29/2000 12:00 PM To: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Tammy Jaquet/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: Estimate for Pooling Service on TW Here is some input from Lynn. ---------------------- Forwarded by Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron on 03/29/2000 10:59 AM --------------------------- Lynn Blair 03/29/2000 05:22 AM To: Tammy Jaquet/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Nacey/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Ramona Betancourt/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: Estimate for Pooling Service on TW Sheila and Lindy, I am not sure I am comfortable giving them any costs. On timing, it varies so much between companies based on systems, manpower, etc. Maybe we should discuss before giving them anything? Thanks. Lynn Tammy Jaquet 03/28/2000 09:06 PM To: Lynn Blair/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Lindy Donoho/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Sheila Nacey/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Ramona Betancourt/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Subject: Estimate for Pooling Service on TW Do you want us to proceed with gathering this data for SoCal? Regards, Tammy ---------------------- Forwarded by Tammy Jaquet/ET&S/Enron on 03/28/2000 09:00 PM --------------------------- "Davidson, Patricia - TPPSD" <PDavidson@socalgas.com< on 03/28/2000 05:08:43 PM To: "'Jaquet, Tammy lee@enron.com'" <tjaquet@enron.com< cc: Subject: Estimate for Pooling Service on TW As you may be aware, SoCalGas is going through Gas Industry Restructuring.? One of our settlement proposals is to provide pooling service.? We have been asked to compare our estimate for cost and development time with others who have implemented pooling service on their system.? Therefore, if you have a ballpark figure of the cost incurred to develop pooling and approximately how long it took to build from the time you provided requirements to your implementation date, we would appreciate it very much.? If you have any questions, you can e-mail me or call me at (213) 24r-3812. Pat Davidson Gas Scheduling Manager Southern California Gas Company pdavidson@socalgas.com
|