|
|
Enron Mail |
Not at all! Fawcett's the antsy one; he is anxious to use his new honorary
law degree (ahem!). I agree it would be risky to indicate our wholehearted support of a settlement when the agreement has yet to be written. It would be like giving SoCal a signed blank check (that's carte blancheto us lawyers), and we don't trust them that much. Once we've signed a real agreement, I do want to file something in support. I'm just trying to plan ahead, is all. Jeff Dasovich @ EES on 04/04/2000 04:32:07 PM To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: I.99-07-003: Post-Interim Settlement Agreement OK, you folks are getting antsy out there. I haven't yet begun to think about a declaration. And don't plan on thinking about one until 1) the Commission has approved the motion, and 2) Socalgas shows during the first week or so that it intends to faithfully put into details what it has agreed to in principal. Also, if the motion is approved, the hearing likely won't happen on the 11th (one would hope). Am I missing something? Are you folks concerned about something that I'm missing?
|