|
|
Enron Mail |
I spoke with Steve Stojic about this and he had the same concern. Even
though I was trying to keep this out of the new rate schedule requirements by not making it a rate schedule, I believe I still managed to cover many checklist items. One that is not covered is testimony similar to what might be filed in a rate case, in order to justify market based rates. We are planning to include a revenue estimate. I'll go over these and make sure everything is addressed before filing. Are you OK with this filing from a general conceptual standpoint? The marketers want to start giving a draft to customers for them to review beginning TODAY. From: Glen Hass 07/17/2000 05:35 PM To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: Re: TW Capacity Options Susan, In reviewing the proposed filing I had some questions. On page 2 in the discussion of ensuring sufficient capacity we offer to establish position guidelines, do we need to outline these and either include them as an exhibit or have them ready for reply to either protesters or a staff data request? Secondly, if we regard this as a new service does our filing comply with all aspects of 154.202 (a) (ii), (iii), (iv) (A) & (B), (v), (vi), (viii) and (ix)? In recent filings the staff has challenged our filings in terms of addressing each of these requirements. I believe many our covered but thought you might like to double check for compliance. What about a revenue estimate? Seems like we need one, even if its still very speculative. Glen From: Susan Scott 07/12/2000 03:19 PM To: Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Jeffery Fawcett/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Kevin Hyatt/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Lorraine Lindberg/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, TK Lohman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Michele Lokay/ET&S/Enron@Enron, Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Julia White/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Shelley Corman/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, sstojic@gbmdc.com, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum@ENRON, John Buchanan/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Ramona Betancourt/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Tony Pryor/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Brian Hensley/ET&S/Enron@Enron Subject: TW Capacity Options Attached for your review is a draft of Transport Options filing that incorporates the comments and suggestions I've received since last week. Please provide any further suggestions/changes to me as soon as possible, but in no case later than close of business, Friday, July 14. The timeline I've discussed with TW Commercial for this project is as follows: Final draft comments Friday, July 14 Circulate draft to customers, customer meetings, time for customers to respond, informal discussion with FERC Mon. July 17 - Wed. July 26 Final internal review/edit of filing Thursday, July 27 FERC filing Monday, July 31 Please let me know your comments on this proposed timeline as well. Thank you.
|