|
|
Enron Mail |
The only problem I can see with this is that paragraph 4 could be construed
to encourage NMNG to request amendment not only to increase the MAXDTQ but also to decrease it (if the MAXDTQ has been increased by a previous amendment). I worry that this might mislead NMNG that the parties can decrease the MAXDTQ by agreement rather than NMNG using capacity release procedures. However, the paragraph does not obligate TW to do anything & doesn't give NMNG any rights, since any change in the MAXDTQ must be by mutual agreement (and it's subject to available capacity). Since it does not seem to give either party anything they do not already get under the tariff, I think I would recommend we omit it. However, NMNG might insist on this or similar language to reflect the "deal" --- or at least the conversations of the parties. If that's the case, I suppose I would advise the marketing folks to limit the language of paragraph 4 to an increase in MAXDTQ and explain that any decrease would have to be thru capacity release. Comments? ---------------------- Forwarded by Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron on 01/24/2000 03:10 PM --------------------------- Christine Stokes 01/24/2000 11:15 AM To: Susan Scott/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Drew Fossum/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Christine Stokes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Steven Harris/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Glen Hass/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Darveaux/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Mary Kay Miller/ET&S/Enron@ENRON, Bill Cordes/ET&S/Enron@ENRON cc: Audrey Robertson/ET&S/Enron@ENRON Subject: Transwestern Contract Approval Request TRANSWESTERN CONTRACT APPROVAL REQUEST Please review the attached discount letter for New Mexico Natural Gas, Inc. (NMNG). The contract's five year term provides for EOT-EOT receipts and deliveries at a $.05/Dth/day transportation rate. The contract's MAXDQ varies by month and is show on the Appendix A of the discount letter. Please indicate your approval via REPLY WITH HISTORY. Officer approvals will be faxed to Bill Cordes for final Officer approval. ]
|