|
|
Enron Mail |
pull out your settlement matrix and see if this SA agrees with that
document. I don't necessarily think it does. Didn't we basically agree to disagree and/or deal with this issue outside the settlement process? Are you saying that Edison can reserve capacity in the same manner as Core and 50% of noncore, but at the approx. 7.9 cent rate? HEY, WAIT A MINUTE.... is this language saying that they can convert the VALUE of their capacity rights to a capacity contract at the point? For example, if Edison has 200/d at 1 cent Wheeler access fee, they could conver it to approx. 25/d at the full 7.9 cent rate? Let's get clarification!!! "Foss, Robert" <RFoss@coral-energy.com< on 04/13/2000 06:14:03 PM To: "'Susan.Scott@enron.com'" <Susan.Scott@enron.com< cc: Subject: RE: more Edison/SDGE stuff I agree 100% and I want them to state they may elect the capacity however, it is at the current rate if you will. This is an attempt to take us back several weeks in my opinion. -----Original Message----- From: Susan.Scott@enron.com [mailto:Susan.Scott@enron.com] Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 6:12 PM To: rfoss@coral-energy.com Subject: more Edison/SDGE stuff Rob, Look at the conforming languange in the Appendix "A" last page, last paragraph. You know that this language was negotiated by and between SoCalGas and Edison. My main concern is that its very, very open ended... almost a contingent liability for all settlement parties. Jeff
|