|
|
Enron Mail |
That's great. Should mean we are set to sign final docs. Is that your
understanding? Per Susan Flynn 06/01/2000 10:55 AM To: Per Sekse/NY/ECT@ECT, Rod Nelson/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Sara Shackleton/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: ISDA with The Ospraie Portfolio Ltd. Please see message below. ----- Forwarded by Susan Flynn/HOU/ECT on 06/01/2000 09:55 AM ----- "Daniel A Harris" <dharris@shearman.com< 06/01/2000 09:36 AM To: Susan.Flynn@enron.com cc: Subject: Re: ISDA with The Ospraie Portfolio Ltd. Susan: Tudor are prepared to not list Treasuries as Eligible Collateral - so the issue goes away I think. Thanks. Susan.Flynn@enron.com on 01/06/2000 15:25:41 To: Daniel A Harris/LN/EU/ShS@ShSDOMAIN cc: Sara.Shackleton@enron.com Subject: Re: ISDA with The Ospraie Portfolio Ltd. Daniel - We have not sent you a revised draft of the ISDA as our trader is speaking with your client's trader re: the issue of treasuries. Our Credit Department thinks that if your client can use treasuries, we should be able to use LCs. Our trader is waiting to hear back from your client's trader. "Daniel A Harris" To: "Susan Flynn" <Susan.Flynn@enron.com< <dharris@shea cc: rman.com< Subject: Re: ISDA with The Ospraie Portfolio Ltd. 05/31/2000 10:41 AM Susan: On the open issues: (1) Eligible Collateral - Tudor will agree to Cash as the only form of Eligible Collateral. (2) Loss v Market Quotation - Tudor will agree to Loss for those trades that still have 2+ years to run on the date of early termination. (3) Jurisdiction - Tudor will not agree to "any court". Tudor will agree to NON-exclusive jurisdiction of the NY Courts though. I look forward to receiving revised drafts. Kind regards. Daniel Harris
|