Enron Mail

From:mark.elliott@enron.com
To:edmund.cooper@enron.com
Subject:Re: Inapa ticket
Cc:sara.shackleton@enron.com
Bcc:sara.shackleton@enron.com
Date:Tue, 3 Aug 1999 10:38:00 -0700 (PDT)

Edmund,

My understanding is that your understanding is correct. I shall speak with
Sara on this issue and then inform all interested parties to avoid further
confusion from certain quarters in
London........................................................

Kind regards

Mark




Edmund Cooper
08/03/99 04:45 PM
To: Mark Elliott/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Inapa ticket

Mark,

This needs to be cleared up.

My understanding is that ECTRIC through EEFT does the trade. The deal is
backed to back with ECT and booked in the ECT book. The deal number for the
original trade should also therefore be from the Houston book. I've already
told this to Lee - correct me if my understanding of the position is
incorrect.

Best, Ed.



---------------------- Forwarded by Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT on 08/03/99 04:44
PM ---------------------------


Tom Bruce-Jones
08/03/99 04:40 PM
To: Jeff Harbert/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Martin Holmes/LON/ECT@ECT, Bob Crane/HOU/ECT@ECT, Edward
Ondarza/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lee Munden/LON/ECT@ECT, Edmund Cooper/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Inapa ticket

Jeff

Given the apparent confusion about how European trades ought to be booked and
monitored, can we arrange a conference call/ video conference in the near
future to iron out any anomalies and ensure that all parties are satisfied
with the arrangements.

Thanks
Tom
---------------------- Forwarded by Tom Bruce-Jones/LON/ECT on 03/08/99 16:34
---------------------------


Lee Munden
03/08/99 15:44
To: Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Steve Kim/HOU/ECT@ECT, Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Scott Pleus/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Harbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Berg/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob
Crane/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lucy Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Martin
Holmes/LON/ECT@ECT, Tom Bruce-Jones/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Inapa ticket

Tanya

I thought that all Pulp & Paper deals were booked in Houston?

It would seem that this deal has been booked incorrectly from ECTRIC, when
it should have been booked from Houston (ECT?)

I have looked at Inapa from a credit perspective.

Lee



Tanya Rohauer
03-08-99 02:36 PM
To: Steve Kim/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Pleus/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Harbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Berg/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob
Crane/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lucy Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lee
Munden/LON/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: Inapa ticket

I am assuming that this deal was approved by someone in London Credit, i.e.
Lee Munden,etc. My understanding of this deal is that it is bewtween a London
legal entity and the counterparty. ECT's involvement is an intercompany back
to back position. This deal should be confirmed out of the London office, and
exposure monitored there.

Thanks,
Tanya





From: Steve Kim 08/03/99 08:29 AM


To: Dale Neuner/HOU/ECT@ECT, Melba Lozano/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott
Pleus/HOU/ECT@ECT, Jeff Harbert/HOU/ECT@ECT, Lisa Berg/HOU/ECT@ECT, Bob
Crane/HOU/ECT@ECT, Tanya Rohauer/HOU/ECT@ECT, Michael Nguyen/HOU/ECT@ECT,
Lucy Ortiz/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Inapa ticket