|
|
Enron Mail |
Cc: laurel.adams@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: laurel.adams@enron.com X-From: Sheila Glover X-To: Sara Shackleton, Samantha Boyd X-cc: Laurel Adams X-bcc: X-Folder: \Sara_Shackleton_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: SHACKLETON-S X-FileName: sshackle.nsf Sara and Sam, Just to clarify.... We have an existing ECT Investments Executing Broker Agreement with MLPFS and do not need an ENA one. The MLPFS agreement with ECT Investments dates from 1996 and they have inactivated on their side. We do need to update the existing agreement as we have alot of current activity with them. This is an update and not a new relationship. Thanks. Sheila ---------------------- Forwarded by Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT on 09/12/2000 08:38 AM --------------------------- Laurel Adams 09/12/2000 08:06 AM To: Sheila Glover/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith/ENA Prime Brokerage Agreement I simply passed on to legal a request from Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner. THe woman I spoke with acted like we were just updating info.
|