Enron Mail

From:dale.neuner@enron.com
To:sara.shackleton@enron.com
Subject:Trades Terminated or in Dispute
Cc:jefferson.sorenson@enron.com
Bcc:jefferson.sorenson@enron.com
Date:Tue, 20 Jul 1999 03:01:00 -0700 (PDT)

Pursuant to our conversation, the different scenarios for trades in dispute
are (and may not be limited to) the following:

Trade agreed Trade not booked No confirm sent
Trade agreed Trade booked Killed on T/D No confirm sent
Trade agreed Trade booked Killed after T/D No confirm sent
Trade agreed Trade booked Trade killed Confirm sent

Trade booked Trade disputed No Confirm sent
Trade booked Trade disputed Confirm sent

Examples:

Scenario 1: the CP calls back one hour after the trade was agreed and states
they now do not agree with the trade. Essentially, it could be disputed
wether or not we had a trade, even though our tapes support our position. No
impact on booking or Confirmation Desk.

Scenarios 2 and 3 occur essentially the same as Scenario 1 with the exception
that the trade is booked. Scenario 2 and 3 a different based on the pricing
implication of a trade booked overnight. In both these scenarios, we should
consider issuing a Termination Agreement which gives some reference to the
details of the agreed transaction.

Scenario 4 is the most straight-forward. An agreed trade, booked and
Confirmed, we issue a Termination Agreement.

Scenarios 5 and 6 are different from Scenarios 2 and 3 in that we have booked
a trade based on our understanding, but OUR understanding of the terms was
incorrect. The two scenarios are different in that in 5 a Confirmation is not
sent. In 5, we should consider issuing a side letter stating that a trade was
booked in error and no such trade exists. In 6 we should consider issuing a
side letter stating the trade was booked AND the Confirmation was sent in
error - and ask that they return the Confirmation.